Podcast Logo

Transcript for 5/2/24: THE CRUSADE NARRATIVE – THE STRUGGLE FOR HEART AND MIND W/ ANTHONY RUSSO

After watching the groundswell of riots at the campuses of America, and as the media attempts to reveal that most of those who are protesting are paid agitators -- I never thought I would have to ask this serious question.

How are we to contend with such antihuman operations conspiring against us?

It is not just the Transhuman future that we are told will be part of the fourth industrial revolution -- it is the crusader philosophies that are being pumped into the zeitgeist and the radicalization of some Americans that will undoubtedly lead to a civil war.

There is precedent and the scenes of the purge are exactly the image and action parameters one sees during a civil surge and the incursion of fellow citizens where you don't know friend from foe.

New York City officials warned of "radicalization" infiltrating the city amid ongoing pro-Palestinian protests at different college campuses. This radicalization is spreading all over. How soon will it become a massive cause that becomes an armed and dangerous conflict? 

Kent State comes to mind -- not there yet thank God, but what happens if something spills over and something goes wrong? This becomes part of a color revolution that will be never-ending.

During a press conference , New York Police Department Deputy Commissioner of Intelligence and Counterterrorism Rebecca Weiner said that there is "a concern around radicalization" in the city. She stopped short of calling it "homegrown terrorism" but said officials were seeing a concerning "trajectory" among young people.

One thing that needs to be pointed out is that the left's worry that MAGA supporters would resort to terrorism has not transpired, but this again seems to echo the riots from groups like ANTIFA and BLACK LIVES MATTER. These radical arms of the left-wing appear to be self-defeating and fragmented to the point that the hardening of the police state seems to be an alternative to business as usual.

Mayor Eric Adams made similar comments during the press conference, saying, "There is a movement to radicalize young people, and I'm not going to wait until it's done and all of a sudden acknowledge the existence of it."

"This is a global problem that young people are being influenced by those who are professionals at radicalizing our children and I'm not going to allow that to happen as the mayor of the city of New York," Adams added.

This is all good for a sound bite -- but these words are empty to the ears of those on the front lines of the protests and to those hidden among the peaceful waiting to gun their way through the crowds.

President Biden also contributes to the vapid and meaningless condemnation of those who are inciting riots.

Biden told reporters :

“I condemn the anti-Semitic protests."

“I also condemn those who don’t understand what’s going on with the Palestinians,"

And the media went all nuts when Trump spoke of the Charlottesville riots and how he said "There Are Very Fine People On Both Sides Of the debate."

The words are there and the meaning is the same -- and of course it is all in the context.

There is, however, a key difference. Trump’s line was almost surely not aimed at tiki-torch neo-Nazis. Believe what you like about Trump’s motivations, but he also later unequivocally condemned the white supremacists on more than one occasion. Biden, on the other hand, can’t even get himself to call out the bad guys without throwing them a bone.

It is also interesting that in the case of the Palestinian crusaders-- these so-called students will eventually be our future Lawyers, media reporters, and state department officials.

And to think the Biden administration wants you to pay off their student loans.

Irony apparently is not dead -- it is not recognized when you have propaganda and the big lie running the show --as both sides are fighting like hell to win over the hearts and minds of people who see their country falling into an all-out civil war.

In these times of great political, economic and societal uncertainty, we can be certain of one thing. Communities across the globe are beset by all the insidious forces of radical change that those in power can dream up for the people they pretend to speak for and rule. 

The forces of change rank in the command and control of a larger war striving at every turn to camouflage the long-planned transition of humankind. 

Everything is subject to capture in the programs of transformation for nationhood, personhood, personal identity, agency, and sovereignty. Some people recognize the tensions and the weapons deployed to bring about total captivity and change. Others deny the evidence of the campaigns waged against them.

The difference between these extremes might be explained by the most contested space in the present war — the struggle for the heart and mind. 

As Edward Bernays the Father of Propaganda reminds us, the mind must be continuously occupied, “every bit as much as an army regiments the bodies of its soldiers”. 

Fear and a deep sense of urgency must be engineered so the projected sacrifice of bodies will, in the final tally, be found justified. 

Young minds on the front lines in support of Palestine don't care about Hamas -- they are told and are programmed to fight and stand up to carnage and mass graves --and have been radicalized to turn on one of The United States' cherished allies.

We know that there are good people on both sides being pushed and coerced into creating the other by their corrupt government and masters who stand on the sidelines financing these confrontations.

The radical propagandists are gathering together all sorts of of theoretical, practical, and radical ideological strands, each of which involves what appears to be a mixture of esoteric mythologies, empirical realities, and media hype, infused with technological developments, political spin, tangible circumstances like the possibility of genocide , and the spectacle of unending public relations campaigns that foment the war footing. 

Separating the material reality of this well-funded global project from the confusing forms of propaganda that support it can be complex and challenging.

The truth is the philosophies are now programmed for kill --and our passive politicians have no clue on how to quiet it down and the deep state delights in the chaos as it gives them a reason to arm up and shoot to kill.

Were agendas such as lethality and harm a part of the blueprint for the chaos that is found in a color revolution -- is civil war a baiting process for the nation in critical condition?

And now, here we are. We have a president who can’t make a moral distinction between bigots and their targets. You can't identify an enemy until he shouts "Death to America" and starts shooting at you.

This is the ugliness of civil war. It is invisible, and countries still function in the middle of it all. You just got to know what areas to stay out of -- places where the fighting is the heaviest.

In nations like Israel , a bomber can blow themselves up in a shopping mall --and businesses do not close, and no one stops schools, or stays home from work.

In South America towards the end of the Dirty War, civil unrest was always in the streets and yet you could find an out-of-the-way coffee shop where you could still read the paper and watch riot police march by to take care of the small incursions that pop up from time to time.

I think people are waiting for that declaration from the President that we are officially at war -- but can't you see that we have already crossed that imaginary red line?

In the meantime, it is all about condemning and praising in some doublethink speech.

The House passed the "Antisemitism Awareness Act" to silence criticism of Jews and Israel as hate speech and empower the federal government to crack down on anti-Israel protests on college campuses.

So now we have to take a hammer after the 1st Amendment because leaders are nothing more than helicopter parents who continue to Infantilize America.

How is this going to help matters?

The bill has a problem beyond violating the 1st Amendment. 

The definition of antisemitism appears nowhere in the bill!

Antisemitism is wrong-- of course, it is, but the Antisemitism Awareness Act could convict Christians of antisemitism for believing the Christian Gospel that says Jesus was handed over to Herod to be crucified by the Jews.

For example in the bill it states the following:

"You are forbidden to use symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism --such as claims that the Jews Killed Jesus or Blood Libel the characterize Jews or Israelis."

The Anti-Defamation League and the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations also pushed Congress earlier this month to pass the controversial FISA law to spy on Americans to "protect Israel."

The Jewish advocacy groups told Congress the spying law was needed first and foremost for " the safety and security of Israel; and the need to protect Jews in the U.S. -- indeed, all Americans -- from terrorist threats."

The bill is supposed to work in concert with the Biden administration's "National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism" which called on "all online platforms" to ban "extremist websites," ban "hate speech" and institute "zero tolerance" policies to protect Jews from antisemitism.

Other contextual examples of the bill include the following 

Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination.…

Applying double standards by requiring of it is a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.

Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.

Holding Jews collectively responsible for the actions of the state of Israel.

It also includes:

Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.

Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as a collective—such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.

Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.

Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g., gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).

Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

Antisemitism is considered the world’s oldest hatred.

he Nazi Holocaust is history’s most extreme example of anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism did not begin with Adolf Hitler: Anti-Semitic attitudes date back to ancient times. In much of Europe throughout the Middle Ages, Jewish people were denied citizenship and forced to live in ghettos. Anti-Jewish riots called pogroms swept the Russian Empire during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and anti-Semitic incidents have increased in parts of Europe, the Middle East and North America in the last several years.

The term anti-Semitism was first popularized by German journalist Wilhelm Marr in 1879 to describe hatred or hostility toward Jews. The history of anti-Semitism, however, goes back much further.

Hostility against Jews may date back nearly as far as Jewish history. In the ancient empires of Babylonia, Greece, and Rome, Jews—who originated in the ancient kingdom of Judea—were often criticized and persecuted for their efforts to remain a separate cultural group rather than taking on the religious and social customs of their conquerors.

Many of the anti-Semitic practices seen in Nazi Germany actually have their roots in medieval Europe. In many European cities, Jews were confined to certain neighborhoods called ghettos.

The struggle is real -- but must we create draconian measures to protect Israelis?

These radical protests have been successful in hardening the resolve of a police state mentality -- and we now have a group granted with the privilege of being above critique.

This is unbelievable --and regardless of how you feel about the Jews -- should we fast-forward these proposals?

Do they think this is going to stop the oldest hatred that ever existed?

Does this by any means sanitize atrocity? Or does it breed more hatred for the Jews?

This is a new crusade-- this is historical in every sense of the word.

I worry that this will all lead to a Moral Disengagement process where an individual convinces himself that ethical standards do not apply to him or her within a particular situation or context.

Moral disengagement can be further broken down into four categories: reconstructing immoral conduct, diffusing responsibility, dehumanizing the victim, and misrepresenting injurious consequences.

Reconstructing conduct is a method of moral disengagement in which the person depicts an otherwise morally reprehensible behavior as having some sort of moral purpose. In this way, he convinces himself that the behavior is now acceptable.

Diffusing responsibility is a method of moral disengagement in which individuals collectively behave in an inhumane manner by aggregating individual behaviors which by themselves are harmless.

Dehumanizing is a method of moral disengagement in which the person convinces himself that the person receiving the behavior is less than human, and thus does not deserve the same treatment as others should receive.

And presto we are back to square one where we treat others with disdain and vilify one group or another to have an excuse to declare war on them.

Misrepresenting injurious consequences is a method of moral disengagement in which the person attempts to avoid admitting to himself that his conduct is wrong by ignoring personal reflection on what the negative consequences of his behavior might be.

The powers that be are using propaganda and policy to dehumanize the planet hoping that we will all be torn on each other -- and it appears that they are succeeding.

They want to see the peasants fight to the death -- is like they are Roman Kings with box seats to witness the bread and circuses.

It is all becoming clear in a dreadful epiphany, the psychopaths are willing to bring back old-fashioned evil to punish the masses.

Things like misanthropic, eugenicist, and even democidal goals are set alongside claims to pursue human enhancement for the betterment of civilization, human safety, security, and well-being. 

Consider the sort of conflicted thinking needed both to communicate and to effectively obscure the processes of total transformation of the human being, prepared for a technocratic posthuman world-- a world that is punished for insolence and forced into a well-controlled panopticon.

It is obvious that we are seeing an emerging order a beguiling sort of fascism in which “more concentrated, unscrupulous, repressive, and militaristic control by a Big Business-Big Government partnership would preserve the privileges of the ultra-rich, the corporate overseers, and the brass in the military and civilian order.

We will all be criminals and enemies of the state in the future because of our prejudices and the myths we cling to.

You may say you are a law-abiding citizen, but they will find something to pin on you --even if it is thought crime -- or bias-- this is out of hand --and is overreaching.

The American people, the permanent underclass in America, have allowed themselves to be so distracted and divided that they have failed to notice the building blocks of tyranny being laid down right under their noses by the architects of the Deep State.

They have us where they want us. 

Many of us , and not in a good way. 

The truth is that ‘mainstream’ media and politics are now captured in a way that is beyond anything we have previously seen. All around the world, political choices have been carefully fixed and filtered to ensure ordinary people are unable to challenge the endless wars, even hate as old as time itself.

The job of the corporate media system is to pretend the choices are real, to ensure the walls of the prison remain invisible.

But we are watching them close in ever so slowly because those who wish to see us fail were patient -- but now we may see things rapidly deteriorate for the sake of rebuilding a New World Order.

Somehow, we are blind to what a mass undeclared war for the hearts and minds looks like, 

Indiscriminate killing. Rape. Mass atrocities. That’s what war is. That is what it has always been. And we’ve been doing it to each other since the dawn of civilization. It is not going to stop. We are not going to stop it.

But now it is televised and packaged well. Algorithms feed us with the images and yet we somehow think it will not get anywhere near us.

How can we continue the denial? -- it is outrageous.

We are, whether we like it or not, a violent species, human beings. It isn’t all we are, but it is part of what we are. 

But we are also healers, and we can be reasonable. The haters were always the minority but with all of the filth and misinformation we are fed by the mainstream fascists, we are all little by little losing our souls.