MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
Social media, especially Twitter, has been nothing more than daily reports of the so-called pandemic of the unvaccinated. There isn’t a morning that goes by that I do not see an email of a tweet that tells me someone has died because they didn’t listen to the science regarding vaccines and how allegedly safe they are.
Creating the unvaccinated class and persecuting them is becoming dangerous and I do not believe people even know what they are indicating when they use such nonsense words like pandemic of the unvaccinated.
There is no need for a history of racial discrimination to hang their hatred of anti-vaxxers, but instead rely on a simple identification of undefinedotherundefined (unvaccinated) and a hatred for those who undefineddonundefinedt care about me, or those that I love.undefined The key common denominator it seems is the common concept of caring for others before caring for yourself, which, ironically, is clearly not the true psychological operator in this situation.
These people seem to care far more for themselves and their own safety and their opinion than they do for the rights and freedoms and safety of others — take the jab to save me, never mind you might die or get sick in the process.
Never mind that we are being told that the pandemic is worse than last year, even though last year virtually no one was vaccinated.
So what we are actually experiencing is undefinednormalundefined — normal from the perspective that human beings have the innate capability of being all sorts of ugly things to people they do not necessarily agree with.
The technocrats need to transform us into an underclass of undefinedanti-social conspiracy theorists,undefined undefinedanti-vaxxer disinformationists,undefined undefinedwhite-supremacist election-result deniers,undefined undefinedpotentially violent domestic extremists,undefined and whatever other epithets they come up with, so that we can be painted as dangerously unhinged freaks and cast out of society in a way that makes it appear that we have cast out ourselves.
If weundefinedve learned anything over the past year and a half, itundefineds that corruption is rampant throughout our public health agencies and medical organizations. As reported by Armstrong Economics, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation funds — and therefore has significant influence over — public health agencies in both the United States and the U.K.
The Gates Foundation also owns undefinedmajor sharesundefined in both Pfizer and BioNTech, which jointly developed a COVID shot that August 23, 2021, was granted full approval for use in people 16 years of age and older by the FDA.
The Gates Foundation started shifting its investments into pharmaceuticals in 2002. That year, Gates invested $205 million into nine large drug companies, including Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson. undefinedThe decision to take stakes in individual firms appears to be a shift in strategy, and for the first time aligns the charityundefineds interests with those of the drug firms,
Gates initially invested in Pfizer undefinedwith the stated intention of undefinedexpand[ing] access to the pharmaceutical companyundefineds all-in-one injectable contraceptive.undefined Once the COVID-19 pandemic broke out, Gates predicted early on that Pfizer would be the first to get emergency use approval.
The Gates Foundation didnundefinedt pick up BioNTech shares until September 2019, just three months before the COVID pandemic emerged, when it bought $55 million worth of shares.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is also involved whether through buying up huge tracts of farmland, promoting a much-heralded (but failed) ‘green revolution’ for Africa, pushing biosynthetic food and new genetic engineering technologies or more generally facilitating the aims of the mega agri-food corporations.
We are currently seeing an acceleration of the corporate consolidation of the entire global agrifood chain. The high-tech/data conglomerates, including Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook and Google, have joined traditional agribusiness giants, such as Corteva, Bayer, Cargill and Syngenta, in a quest to impose a certain type of agriculture and food production on the world.
Of course, those involved in this portray what they are doing as some kind of humanitarian endeavor – saving the planet with ‘climate-friendly solutions’, helping farmers or feeding the world. This is how many of them probably do genuinely regard their role inside their corporate echo chamber. But what they are really doing is repackaging the dis-possessive strategies of imperialism as ‘feeding the world’.
Controlling what we eat and what we use is part of the strategies that have been proposed by the World Economic Forum.
Since the Green Revolution, US agribusiness and financial institutions like the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund have sought to hook farmers and nation states on corporate seeds and proprietary inputs as well as loans to construct the type of agri infrastructure that chemical-intensive farming requires.
Monsanto-Bayer and other agribusiness concerns have since the 1990s been attempting to further consolidate their grip on global agriculture and farmers’ corporate dependency with the roll-out of genetically engineered seeds, commonly known as GMOs.
It is now clear that the Green Revolution has been a failure in terms of its devastating environmental impacts, the undermining of highly productive traditional low-input agriculture and its sound ecological footing, the displacement of rural populations and the adverse impacts on village communities, nutrition, health and regional food security.
Regardless, the industry and its well-funded lobbyists and bought career scientists continue to spin the line that GM crops are a marvelous success and that the world needs even more of them to avoid a global food shortage. GM crops are required to feed the world is a well-worn industry slogan trotted out at every available opportunity. Just like the claim of GM crops being a tremendous success, this too is based on a myth.
New gene drive and gene editing techniques have now been developed and the industry is seeking the unregulated commercial release of products that are based on these methods.
The question remains as to what Bill Gates who has invested in vaccines is now interested in the agribusiness.
The answer may lie in genetically modified foods that contain the ingredients found in mRNA vaccines.
Vaccinations can be a controversial subject for many people, especially when it comes to injections. So what if you could replace your next shot with a salad instead? Researchers at the University of California-Riverside are working on a way to grow edible plants that carry the same medication as an mRNA vaccine.
The COVID-19 vaccine is one of the many inoculations which use mRNA technology . They work by teaching cells from the immune system to recognize and attack a certain infectious disease. Unfortunately, mRNA vaccines have to stay in cold storage until use or they lose stability. The UC-Riverside team says if they’re successful, the public could eat plant-based mRNA vaccines — which could also survive at room temperature.
Thanks to a $500,000 grant from the National Science Foundation, researchers are now looking accomplish three goals. First, the team will try to successfully deliver DNA containing mRNA vaccines into plant cells, where they can replicate. Next, the study authors want to show that plants can actually produce enough mRNA to replace a traditional injection. Finally, the team will need to determine the right dosage people will need to eat to properly replace vaccinations.
Ideally, a single plant would produce enough mRNA to vaccinate a single person.
Scientists are are testing this approach with spinach and lettuce and have long-term goals of people growing it in their own gardens. Farmers could also eventually grow entire fields of it.
A team of scientists from UC-San Diego and Carnegie Mellon University say the key to making edible vaccines are chloroplasts. These are small organs inside plant cells which help convert sunlight into energy.
Juan Pablo Giraldo, an associate professor in UCR’s Department of Botany and Plant Sciences reported thatcloroplasts are solar-powered factories that produce sugar and other molecules which allow the plant to grow,” Giraldo explains. “They’re also an untapped source for making desirable molecules.”
Previous studies have shown that it’s possible for chloroplasts to express genes which are not a natural part of that plant. Giraldo’s team accomplished this by sending genetic material inside of a protective casing into plant cells.
In the new study, Giraldo teamed with UC-San Diego’s Professor Nicole Steinmetz to use nanotechnology to deliver more genetic material into chloroplasts.
“Our idea is to repurpose naturally occurring nanoparticles, namely plant viruses, for gene delivery to plants,” Steinmetz says. “Some engineering goes into this to make the nanoparticles go to the chloroplasts and also to render them non-infectious toward the plants.”
Again, the magic dust technique will be used to deliver vaccines in spinach and lettuce and many other vegetables that can be consumed by the public.
I am sure the technocrats think that this is a game changer and that those who do not wish to be jabbed will see this as a heathy alternative.
Biotechnologists at the Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, an independent research center at Cornell University in New York State, are genetically engineering a banana to produce an antigen found in the outer coat of the Hepatitis B virus. Banana vaccines would be ideal for developing countries because they would cost just a few cents per dose, compared to the $100 to $200 per dose for traditional vaccines.
Last year, the team showed that Hepatitis B antigens produced by genetically engineered potatoes triggered an immune response in rats. But because potatoes are not eaten raw, and cooking them would destroy the vaccine, they are unsuitable for vaccinating people. So the researchers switched their efforts to bananas, which are already grown extensively throughout the developing world.
The genetically engineered bananas could be grown on special plantations. For example, just 10 hectares of the fruit would be enough to vaccinate all children under five years old in Mexico. The vaccine would be delivered not as raw bananas, but in a purée similar to baby food.
The researchers are working with colleagues in Mexico on a series of experiments with banana-vaccines. They hope that the Mexican government and the US Food and Drug Administration will approve the vaccines at the same time. The scientists will also experiment with banana vaccines for diarrhea, which kills millions of children in developing countries each year.
They have already engineered potatoes to produce antigens from Escherichia coli, a common cause of diarrhea in developing countries, and the Norwalk virus, which is often the culprit in the developed world. These produced an immune response in mice fed raw potatoes.
Can you imagine ordering your Impossible Whopper with an order of mRNA fries and milkshake that has antibiotics in it?
We are now heading for the technocratic nightmare where we will see a new and improved Agricultural/Biological/Genocidal Industrial Complex.
Somewhere in the midst of the 20th century push to contrive a pretext to cull the global population, many billionaires and chemical warfare companies just decided that they now care about what you eat and what chemicals to put in your body.
Many of these billionaires like Bill Gates cherry-picked all they could from Eugenicists like his Father, Galton, Sanger, Darwin and Malthus and then fell in love with the idea of controlling the important things that we use to sustain our lives.
Meanwhile, Bill Gates who in 2010, bought 500,000 shares of Monsanto, a leading producer of GMOs, has now been quietly snatching up 242,000 acres of farmland across the U.S. — enough to make him the top private farmland owner in America.
After years of reports that he was purchasing agricultural land in places like Florida and Washington, The Land Report revealed that Gates, who has a net worth of nearly $121 billion according to Forbes, has built up a massive farmland portfolio spanning 18 states. His largest holdings are in Louisiana (69,071 acres), Arkansas (47,927 acres) and Nebraska (20,588 acres). Additionally, he has a stake in 25,750 acres of transitional land on the west side of Phoenix, Arizona, which is being developed as a new suburb.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has further invested in the development and proliferation of “super crops” resistant to climate change and higher-yield dairy cows. Last year, the organization announced Gates Ag One, a nonprofit to advance those efforts.
There is some indication that the land could be used in a way that aligns with the foundation’s values. Cottonwood Ag Management, a subsidiary of Cascade, is a member of Leading Harvest, a nonprofit that promotes sustainable agriculture standards that prioritize protections of crops, soil and water resources.
Monsanto had paid out billions over a few years to plaintiffs who had been made permanently ill and maimed by them, or who were claiming on behalf of loved ones who hadn’t been that lucky. You’d expect a government to intervene and order them to clean up their act or face closure. Instead, all things are forgiven and the people are not aware of what awaits them – or what might end up on their dinner table.
And now, as Gates nears orgasm as his dream of transforming the inner workings of the Homosapien to resemble that of one of his Windows programs so they will need permanent ‘updates’ via injections their arms, or if we could just get the kids to eat their spinach, Gates investments in farmland would pay off.
We are about to see a wide-ranging shift to agroecology. The agroecological paradigm is not just about growing food; it involves reimagining our relationship with nature and science and how we can eat synthesized foods that can include pharmaceuticals among other things.
Agroecology is based on food sovereignty, which encompasses the right to healthy and culturally appropriate food and the right of people to define their own food and agriculture systems.
For 10 years the plan has been to graduate the public into eating culturally inappropriate foods,
The goal however is to eliminate famine and food scarcity by providing sustainable agriculture that is carbon-free and “green-friendly.” This means that our future foods will include genetically modified plants to boost specific vitamin chemicals while having no idea of the long-term consequences of genetic pollution or cross-species genetic experiments carried out openly in a fragile ecosystem.
Other oddities that will be introduced into our foodstuffs are modified proteins from other sources.
Therefore, schemes are needed and are being actively pursued by Bill Gates, mercenary scientists, academia, and governments to collapse global food webs and replace them with alternative protein and vegetable foodstuffs.
