MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
Today is the observance of the 911 attacks 19 years ago. I reluctantly buried myself in the books to deliver an important show to everyone that was urging me to talk about the event. As I was going over documents and analysis I was inspired by a news header on CNN. CNN has been pushing the COVID-19 narrative and the header said Americans are observing 911 in the midst of COVID-19.
The narrative that was included - the death toll of the 911 attacks. They reported nearly 3000 died—the official count was 2,977 people. This included 343 firefighters and 71 law enforcement officers.
However, as the blonde reporter gave the death totals, I noticed the American death tolls for COVID-19 and then I saw the death toll for the world on this day 911 thousand.
19 million have recovered from COVID-19 – the numbers 19 and 911 triggered thoughts of comparison.
COVID-19 was first reported in 2019. Itundefineds been 19 years since 9/11. 19 million people have recovered from COVID-19 worldwide with 911K deaths total, registering today. 911 new deaths were registered in the United States today from COVID-19 on the 19th anniversary of 9/11.
Then it dawned on me – for many years after the attacks we were told that if there was another attack on this country the death toll would be a lot worse.
Then I remembered something in all of my reporting that made me take a breath and I realized that while many have called COVID-19 a plandemic, would anyone wish to speculate that like 911, COVID-19 was an inside job where wealthy technocrats and politicians planned and carried out the spread of this pandemic to successfully destroy this country?
We all know that back in October, a “high-level pandemic exercise” entitled “Event 201” was held in New York City. The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in conjunction with the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, brought together “15 leaders of business, government, and public health” to simulate a scenario in which a coronavirus pandemic called CAPS was ravaging the planet. The current coronavirus outbreak that originated in China did not begin until December, and so at that time, it was supposedly just a hypothetical exercise.
Event 201 predicted COVID-19 while 9/11 was the 102 minutes that undefinedchanged America forever.undefined
If anyone reviews the agenda that was brought up during the exercise, you would see that it follows a blueprint precisely and no one questions this or reports it.
This is why many people believe that the COVID-19 outbreak was well planned and executed by a conspiracy of people to completely destroy the morale and economy of the United States.
Equally for years, people have said that 911 was also well planned and executed by a conspiracy of people to completely destroy the morale and economy of the United States.
However, the 911 attacks and the planning was far more complex but as with Event 201 there were various table top exercises that were plaid out that indicated that something was about to go down in real world.
In December of 2000, a committee appointed by Congress called “The Advisory Panel to Assesses Domestic Response Capabilities for Terrorism Involving Weapons of Mass Destructionundefined, released its second annual report. It flatly stated: “We are impelled by the stark realization that a terrorist attack on some level inside our birders is inevitable.”
Even more to the point on September 10th, 2001 the day before the attacks the congressional research service issued a report titled “Terrorism: Near Eastern Groups and State Sponsors, which warned of possible terror plots being carried out by either Saddam Hussein or Osama Bin Laden.
What is even creepier is that even before terrorism abroad was a concern for lawmakers a number of other table top exercises were being carried out.
Of course we have been talking a lot about “Dark Winter “an exercise that was carried out in June of 2001. At the end of the exercise it was concluded by the Defense Department that “Americans will likely die on American soil, possibly in large numbers.
In fact, the first of the 15 major conclusions listed was that “America will become increasingly vulnerable to hostile attack on our Homeland and our military superiority and first responders will not be able to protect us.”
This was the first warning of a black sky hazardundefined which became academic after the 911 attacks.
The attacks were being touted as our New Pearl Harbor – a term that was coined in another document that stands as a manifesto that certainly predicted 911 and COVID-19 as a way to get the American people to surrender their Sovereignty.
Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, John Bolton and others wrote a manifesto that became a strict blueprint for the expansion of the Military Industrial Complex and the advanced police state in the United States.
The Manifesto was called the Project for the New American Century, “Strengthening America’s Defenses and it was a blueprint for the police state. It called for the necessity of Military spending, the Militarization of space. It called for the toppling of regimes, the offensive stance of our military against Central Asia and the Middle East and the willingness to use nuclear weapons to control the world’s resources.
The problem that faced the authors of this radical plan is that the American people would not stand for this. There is no way Americans would stand for this radical change. Americans knew of the warnings of President Eisenhower and his exhortation to not allow the growth of the Military industrial complex.
All that Dick Cheney and the planners needed was a body count.
All that was missing was what one of the PNAC planners called a “Pearl Harbor-type event” to galvanize public support for unlimited military action. Later the planners got what they had written about as planes were hijacked by terrorists. Two met their targets in New York at the World Trade center, the other hit the Pentagon - one allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania.
To quote this criminal proposal – it reads:
undefinedTo further the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one-absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event- like a new Pearl Harbor. Going further to describe its agenda, the cabal stated that “the Cold War was a bipolar world; the 21st century world is, for the moment at least decidedly unipolar with America as the world’s sole superpower”.
And further we read:
“Advanced forms of biological warfare that can ‘target’ specific genotypes may transform biological warfare … to a politically useful tool.”
Quite literally, the plan was to exploit a new Pearl Harbor – the 911 attacks and biological warfare that can ‘target’ specific genotypes—COVID-19,
Two types of asymmetrical warfare suited for those in power who wish to blame others and use plausible deniability when investigations lead to an inside job thesis.
.Government officials get away with criminal activity because we have established a system that intrinsically knits corruption into the government construct. Where the law itself grants immunity in a way that makes successful prosecution the exception.
Successful prosecution and investigations into criminal activities in government also costs money. If you were to take a look at history’s most nefarious cases you would see that while some cases have deep pockets for investigation. Other cases, where criminal wrongdoing can be traced to public leaders, seem to be limited in budget.
For example, the overall cost for investigating the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster totaled $100 million dollars and the Columbia disaster investigation came in at a whopping $175 million dollars. When it comes to alleged criminal activity or wrong doing with a political figure or alphabet agency, investigation budgets are much lower.
The investigation into the Watergate scandal totaled $12 million dollars. The Clinton/Lewinsky scandal investigation cost the taxpayers $30 million dollars. Iran/Contra ran up a total of $35 million dollars.
The investigation into the September 11th, 2001 attacks only totaled $3 million dollars. Now, that was all that was allocated. Public Law 107-306 provided for the allowance of $3 million for the 9/11 Commission. Congress subsequently appropriated, and the President signed into law, an additional $11 million appropriation for the Commission. Recent legislation authorized an additional $1 million, bringing the Commission’s total budget to $15 million. Still the offering originally set at 3 million was an embarrassment. After haggling and begging $15 million is still less than investigating a stain on a blue dress. How is it that the biggest crime of the century was left with a small amount of money for investigating an alleged terrorist attack that plunged us into two wars?
$15 million wasn’t enough to even start getting to the bottom of what happened. $15 million didn’t pay for much other than some press releases and the costs of printing reports. It certainly wasn’t enough to pay for real investigation or legal struggles to discover information which the government was stonewalling. The lack of funding and the lack of cooperation from the government compromised the investigation.
9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It should be a national scandal“; “This investigation is now compromised . . . This is `The Gong Show’“; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up.”
In August 2002, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) launched what would become a six-year investigation of the three building failures that occurred on September 11, 2001 the well-known collapses of the World Trade Center Twin Towers that morning and the lesser-known collapse late that afternoon of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7, which was not struck by an airplane.
NIST conducted its investigation based on the stated premise that the “WTC Towers and WTC 7 [were] the only known cases of total structural collapse in high-rise buildings where fires played a significant role.”
Neither before nor since 9/11 have fires caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise—nor has any other natural event, with the exception of the 1985 Mexico City earthquake, which toppled a 21-story office building. Otherwise, the only phenomenon capable of collapsing such buildings completely has been by way of a procedure known as controlled demolition, whereby explosives or other devices are used to bring down a structure intentionally.
Although NIST finally concluded after several years of investigation that all three collapses on 9/11 were due primarily to fires, fifteen years after the event a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists are unconvinced by that explanation.
Is it any wonder why there are so many conspiracy theories about the event?
Even when the so-called 28 pages about 911 were released, there was really no smoking gun. Entire paragraphs are redacted, especially in crucial points.
What we have access to shows that the Saudi government including top officials, including then Saudi ambassador to the U.S., Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and other members of the royal family – financed and actively aided the hijackers prior to September 11, 2001.
We also have learned that according to antiwar.com Two of the hijackers had extensive contacts with Saudi naval officers in the United States, according to telephone records. And when Abu Zubaydah, one of the accused 9/11 conspirators, was captured in Pakistan, they found the phone number of a Colorado company that managed “the affairs of the Colorado residence of the Saudi Ambassador.” Prince Bandar is practically the star of the suppressed 28 pages – no wonder the Bush administration, which had close ties to him, fought so hard to keep this secret.
The 28 pages also reveal that an individual – name redacted – associated with al-Qaeda and the hijackers sneaked into the US, avoiding Customs agents and the INS due to the fact that he was traveling with a member of the Saudi royal family. We are also told that “Another Saudi national with close ties to the Saudi Royal Family, [redacted], is the subject of FBI counter-terrorism investigations and reportedly was checking security at the United States’ southwest border in 1999 and discussing the possibility of infiltrating individuals into the United States.”
Prince Bandar went on to become head of Saudi intelligence: his personal relationship with the Bush family is well-known, and his access to US government officials – and his powerful influence in Washington once again creates more circumstantial evidence that 911 was an inside job.
It would not be stretching the evidence to bluntly state that the suppressed 28 pages of the Joint Inquiry report on the 9/11 terrorist attacks places agents of the Saudi government at the epicenter of the plot. In short, there’s no two ways about it: the Saudis did 9/11. They worked jointly with a criminal element in our government and since our government had no desire to retaliate against them covered up the truth and lied in order to put us in perpetual war.
After 19 years this hasn’t made the narrative and today when you tune into news program, there is a small mention of the 9/11 attacks –and now the tragedy has been paired with COVID-19 and with the fires in the pacific.
We have literally gone from the ashes of the 9/11 attacks to the ashes of the fires that are raging.
Arguably, each event can be seen as an asymmetrical warfare event because each event has attempted to plunge this nation into ruin.
The 9/11 attacks produced more than 3000 deaths – it also became apparent that an attack this big would have had to be an inside job, meaning that criminal elements within our government worked with several criminal elements in other governments to throw our nation into chaos in order to extend the arm of the military industrial complex. This attack was also part of the scheme to begin the conversation about socialism and world government as the end game.
The 3000 deaths were not enough – to traumatize Americans. For years after the 911 attacks the United States was plagued with rumors of more attacks and that it was crucial that we surrender our freedoms and allow for the surveillance state and a conversion of our local police forces into military style units.
The justification of militarizing the police, was increased school shootings, threats other terrorist acts, and rioting in the streets.
COVID-19 – the second round in rebuilding Americas defenses has killed more people than the 9/11 attacks.
For 19 years, we have been in the middle of a very complex operation that aims to bring down America in a controlled demolition The 911 attack was that began the process that stripped us of our cherished freedoms of life, liberty, and the pursuit of property, COVID-19 has taken away our right to life with dignity and our ability to work. It has not only killed hundreds of thousands but has also destroyed the morale and the economy of the United States and now the wildfires are taking away people’s right to property.
The ashes from the fires in the west are raining down from the sky just like on that fateful day in New York 19 years ago.
No matter where you land on the issue of whether or not the coronavirus was released from a lab or a biological attack the fact is COVID-19 is being treated as though it was.
COVID-19 put the United States on a war footing and the incessant detainment and lockdowns have created a restless populace that has rebelled and is now burning down and destroying cities.
It appears to be a three tiered plan of destroying the country.
During the George W Bush administration, there was a popular in conspiracy theory where it was speculated that events might be orchestrated which would allow the Bush family to complete a coup against the US Constitution and hold on to power indefinitely.
At the time such paranoia and suspicion was warranted.
We were facing uncertainty in the wake of the 911 attacks and were actually told to accept advancements in Orwellian surveillance programs and unprecedented military expansionism.
Those who got over their fear started to shout from the rafters that the 911 attacks were an excuse to start the ball rolling for socialism and the establishment of the surveillance state.
Of course those who would report this were correct because after the Obama administration, we realized that even though he preached change – he gave us more of the same. We were still at war, surveillance was increased, warrantless wiretapping was now normal and there was always the threat of drones being used to take out enemy combatants or those that Obama felt were a threat to his Presidency.
Obama was loved by his party, tolerated by those that knew what his agenda was, and was certainly the first President willing to surrender our sovereignty to the World Body.
Again, the cry went up from the conspiracy crowd, we must keep watch on a President that may use domestic terrorism as a way to disarm the populace and to remain in control.
In today’s hysterical Trump-centric political environment, we now see mainstream voices in mainstream outlets openly advancing the same conspiratorial speculations about the current administration, however this time the fear is so great that there have been governors questioning if his declaration of ultimate power in decisions pertaining to COVID-19 gives him delusions of grandeur.
However we are now seeing that the states in a fit if insurrection have allowed looting and civil upheaval without pointing out how this is dangerous in a pandemic. These same governors have also been accused of foot dragging with regard to getting first responders in play to respond to the wildfires.
When faced with the possibility that these fires have been intentionally set in a manner similar to asymmetric warfare, genetic engineering or even directed energy weapons – the blame is shifted to Climate Change which again is a catch all for plausible deniability.
A steadily growing percentage of Americans know that some form of threat does exist which actually challenges the continued existence of this Republic. The opinions of what the threats consist of vary from person to person because of political views and religious affiliation.
Other opinions are now being turned with the use of successful propaganda.
There are also people that want to believe that every word from the media is in their best interest and yet here we are and those who are suffering are not the technocrats and not the politicians – we are!
