MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
One of the age old arguments that fuels most conspiracy talk is that science and religion are both wrong in some respects. The reason is that everyone argues over religion and science based on his or her own beliefs. Inconvenient data is often ignored, suppressed, discredited or explained in some pre-digested sound bite that is often forgotten.
People who claim that they have awakened or have seen the light are very much aware that all things are in an intermediate state between extremes. In the fundamental sense the extremes are birth and death. All that is in between is intermediate. You can divide it all up and break it all down into an eternal state of extremes and realize that everything that you believe and read is what is fashionable for the time and not necessarily the truth. However, that does not mean that buried in all of it isn’t a little pinch of reality.
What is reality anyway? Can it be questioned? Yes, of course it can and that is the fundamental building block for scientific inquiry.
Scientific inquiry is a process of developing an explanation of a question in the natural world (or universe) by testing, investigating and collecting data that will either support or refute your original idea of what’s going on. Of course many of us take for granted that science gives us facts, and so we do not question the programming of those so called “facts.” However a healthy mind willing to question doesn’t mind getting into all of the messy scientific methods to prove the facts for themselves the process of testing ideas by collecting evidence.
Unfortunately, those who wish to disassemble the scientific explanations already provided by some nebulous authorities are now being frowned upon and are now being called anti-science. The very scientific method used to question data provided by scientists is now being called anti-science, a label that should have every one of us worried.
There are some people who see themselves as critical thinkers. They question some of the data that is being presented as “true” data by some nebulous body that are faceless scientists that give us their hypothesis ion many of the most pressing matters that face us today.
However the media and many minions of the mask, have now demanded that we do not question the likes of Dr. Fauci or any of the other so called experts that are allegedly there to give you what is being called science.
The truth is what is being presented is what can be called undefinedPolitifacts.undefined Basically, political fact that when mixed with scientific opinion are spun into undeniable truth- or truth that should never be questioned or denied. Everything that is questioned now ends up with a fact check response which again has nothing to do with science but everything to do with technocratic politifact.
Global Research reported, America’s Frontline Doctors held a press conference on Capitol Hill last week. Over 17 million people watched the conference before YouTube, Twitter and Facebook gave it the “misinformation” stamp of disapproval and deleted it.
Public health authorities would likely deem the main message of America’s Frontline Doctors as “false.” In their press conference they state that hydroxychloroquine (when combined with zinc) is a safe and effective drug in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. This anti-malaria drug has been used for decades to treat auto-immune conditions.
That said, this drug may offer the extra boost elderly and immune-compromised people need in surviving any respiratory illness. Also, most people don’t live a healthy lifestyle and would rather rely on a drug to keep them well. And I’d much rather see people having the option to voluntary take a moderate dose of hydroxychloroquine every few days; rather than all of us being forced to take a rushed and improperly tested COVID-19 vaccine every few months. But alas - these doctors were not approved by the faceless authorities that skew the narrative and so their findings were deemed pseudoscience by the mainstream media.
The other night I stayed in the office late with my producer Wes. We were working on a new podcast project that was being picked up by a podcast network. It is a podcast that features some of our best moments and intense moments of the broadcast. As we were going over material, we heard a caller from a few nights ago that claimed he was a big fan of the show and a geneticist. He told me that he didnundefinedt like how I was saying that science is not always accurate and that it is never settled.
I stated on the air that science has been wrong on a lot of things especially when it comes to our health and well-being. He did not agree. So I asked him about how Science was wrong about Thalidomide and I said what can you tell me about it.
He said undefinedI am a geneticist and I canundefinedt comment on that.undefined
I then asked him about Eugenics programs where scientists declared that genetic defectives needed to be sterilized to improve the gene pool.
He then said undefinedI am a geneticist and I canundefinedt answer that.undefined
It was then I lost my composure, I realized that I was getting the same passive aggressive treatment that most people get when they ask hard questions about Climate Change, Vaccines and other drugs. There seems to be this passive aggressive attitude that is used as a tactic to avoid or otherwise silence anyone who has some questions about scientific inconsistencies.
In the finality of all the discussion and concern, we are told to trust the experts and how the science is settled.
Those who question are now being called anti-science.
I want to give a word of warning -and this is to all those who think Politifact is science.
In failing to recognize that science can be political, the media and the politicians get into the business of the resurrection of dangerous ideas. Acting as if theories — especially those about humans — exist in cultural or political vacuums is a ridiculous fallacy.
In failing to recognize that science can be political, the media and parts of the scientific community allows the resurrection of dangerous ideas. Acting as if theories — especially those about humans — exist in cultural or political vacuums is a ridiculous fallacy.
If the past is to be called upon to legitimize the present, as it so frequently is, then the veracity of so called scientific undefinedproofsundefined have to be continuously vetted- when it comes to what is happening with COVID-19 undefined and what drugs to take and not take it is not at all out of line to actually listen and think about other views than just the talking points of so called politifacts that take the objectivity out of the scientific process.
Scientists rarely interrogate the histories even of their own disciplines and politicians lie for their own self-interest.
You can guess that the combination is lethal.
The thalidomide tragedy occurred in the 1950s, a time when the standards of regulation in the pharmaceutical industry were not nearly as rigorous as they are today. Thalidomide was first marketed in Germany during the mid-1950s as a drug to aid with sleeping problems and insomnia. The drug’s safety was emphasized heavily, and it was advertised as being acceptable for anyone to ingest, including pregnant women and children. In fact, the drug’s developers confidently proclaimed that they “‘could not find a dose [of thalidomide] high enough to kill a rat.’” Thalidomide sales skyrocketed, and by 1960, the drug was marketed in 46 countries. At this time, research on thalidomide had begun to show the drug’s effectiveness in alleviating nausea in pregnant women, and many physicians started prescribing the drug off-label as a treatment for morning sickness. Not long after thalidomide started being used for this purpose, scientists began to observe birth defects in children born to mothers who had taken thalidomide during their pregnancy; studies showed that exposure was particularly dangerous for infants born to mothers that had used the drug approximately 20–34 days post-fertilization. Common birth defects seen in these children included deletion of the ears, deafness, severe underdevelopment or absence of the arms, defects in the femur and tibia (bones of the legs), and many more. More than 10,000 children around the world were born with thalidomide-related birth defects, and tragically, many of these children, now adults, still suffer from the effects of thalidomide.
Science said it was a safe drug undefined people took it undefined people were harmed.
In the 1940undefineds and 1950undefineds science determined that the use of DDT was safe.
DDT was released for public use as The Food and Drug Administration established a “safe” DDT content limit of up to 7 parts per million in food, although, at the time no one could possibly know at that time what, if any, level was ‘safe’ over the long run. Although its potential risks were well known in the scientific community and widely circulated in the mainstream media, DDT’s progress to market was generally unimpeded.
Many children that were sprayed with DDT to kill lice began vomiting, having tremors or shakiness, and seizures. It was later found to be a deadly carcinogen.
Science, pressured politically by Chemical companies said it was safe undefined people were harmed.
Many younger people are unaware that at one time Cigarette Smoking was recommended by Doctors. Thatundefineds right there were many ads that extolled the virtues of smoking menthol cigarettes to cool down that smokers cough undefined it was even recommended that women that were pregnant should smoke a cigarette to alleviate stress.
Science again was wrong undefined people were later diagnosed with various cancers and heart disease from smoking.
But of course now you certainly cannot question the so called politifacts without getting fact checked. What is most disconcerting is that there no real transparency as to how these decisions are being made about our health and wellbeing.
It is very easy to trash honest people, but it is much harder to say that someone who reached the very pinnacle of world science from a humble working class background is an ignorant moron who does not know what they are talking about.
I always get undefinedWho are you going to trust the guy who talks about aliens and bigfoot or a scientist?undefined
Well, I talk about a lot of things and I read a lot more than most and history is my specialty. So the history of so called Politifact as opposed to science has given us many things including Eugenics programs where people were either euthanized or sterilized because they were swimming in the shallow end of the gene pool. Critical thinkers are now being labeled anti-science, and it is the opinion of gullible science followers that critical thinkers have declared war on science.
But doesn’t this clearly show that the gun has already been fired and that science has already shot itself in the foot by criticizing those who question?
It is ironic that this time around the mainstream media is using the concept of anti-science, because if it really considered the meaning of that term, it would realize that science is the open-minded search for knowledge using theories and testing to discover the truth. Those who want the truth on issues like fluoridation, vaccines and GMOs are pro-science, because they want real and independent tests done in these areas instead of the corporate junk science which is performed in its place.
During the first Swine Flu scare of 1976, it was estimated at the time that the disease could infect 50 million to 60 million Americans. But it never unfolded. Only about 200 cases of swine flu and one death were ultimately reported in the U.S. However, a panicked CDC called on President Ford, and Congress to begin a mass inoculation of the population. 40 million people lined up to get the vaccine. More than 500 people are thought to have developed Guillain-Barre syndrome after receiving the vaccine; 25 died. Many saw it as a political farce and a cruel open biological experiment on the American people.
A year later, there was a mountain of information that was declassified regarding the U.S. Biological weapons programs that included the unknown testing of Bio Chemicals on the people of the United States. Some of these reports showed that citizens were sprayed with various chemicals resulting in dementia, miscarriages, impotence, headaches, neuralgia, Herpes Zoster, nausea, irritable bowel syndrome, birth defects and low grade fevers.
The sprays were aerosolized and dropped from planes. For those who consider chemtrails to be hoaxes or fraudulent there is documented proof that aerosolized diseases were released on an unsuspecting public and from there we were seeing strange behaviors in what were once curable diseases.
By the year 2000, there was a great deal of money going into the advertising of drugs that allegedly alleviated these very same problems. From Prilosec to Viagra, to specially modified over the counter medications for migraines, these new miracle drugs were developed in the early 1980’s tested and prepared for approval. Many of these new drugs were developed allegedly to counter-act the effects of an environmental accident caused by bio-weapon open-air experimentation on the American people from the 1940’s to the early 1970’s.
All the new drugs on the market now are available because of iatrogenic artifacts produced by the government and tested by the military on the United States populace. These drugs are being peddled by so called scientists and doctors that have invested interest in these drugs. They push their new drugs and even vaccines that people are more than willing to take even though they are unaware that they could be a victim of a massive gain of function exercise and what is most twisted undefined it is carried out with plausible deniability.
In 1979, a declassified review claimed that the United States intensified its development of ethnic weapons designed to selectively target and eliminate specific ethnic groups who are susceptible due to genetic differences and variations in DNA. These weapons were classified under project code named MK NAOMI which specifically was a plan to store materials that could either incapacitate or kill a test subject and to develop devices to use for the diffusion of such materials over widely populated areas. Much of the details of the operation and how the materials were dispersed is scarce. However, new programs replacing M.K. NAOMI through the U.S. Army’s Special Operations Command gave evidence of at least three covert techniques for attacking and poisoning crops and animal products that have been examined under field conditions.
After the experimental spraying, evidence suggests that under MK NAOMI, CIA funded scientists were called in to use special surgical devices, standard blood coagulants, cryogenic technology, and microwave equipment, to use on “infected” farm animals. Reports surfaced about so called “Cattle Mutilations” where bovine test subjects are found with surgically removed ears, lips, tongues, mammary glands, genitalia, anuses, and blood. The carcasses were air-dropped into fields out of black helicopters.
Many conspiracy theorists at the time were speculating that what was happening was undefinedsecond generationundefined testing where animals were exposed to various chemicals, viruses and diseases in order to see how they affected them. Once the tests were okayed on the animals, the next logical step was to do gain of function experiments on humans without their consent.
In the aftermath of World War II after the annihilation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, the atom bomb was tested on several species of animals. Immobilized in metal stalls, tethered to designated areas, and left wandering on the open decks, pigs, goats and sheep were the unwitting recipients of a full-on blast of an atomic bomb.
“Operation Crossroads” was a series of nuclear weapons tests conducted by the United States at Bikini Atoll in the Marshall Islands in 1946. The purpose of the operation, which included two shots, ABLE and BAKER, was to investigate the effect of nuclear weapons on naval warships. They were the first tests to be publicly announced beforehand and observed by an invited audience, which included a large press corps.
A fleet of more than ninety vessels were assembled at varying distances around the lagoon as a target. The target fleet consisted of older U.S. warships and submarines, three captured German and Japanese ships, and other surplus auxiliary and amphibious vessels. Some of the ships were loaded with live animals, such as pigs and rats, to study the effects of the nuclear blast and radioactive fallout on animals.
The animals having been shaved were aboard the ironically named, taxpayer-funded, “Atomic Ark.” There were no survivors.
A few years later, in 1951, donkeys were subjected to lethal radiation doses. The animals slowly died with ulcerations of the gums and anuses, bleeding from the mouth, lethargy, disorientation, collapse, and then death. Again, no survivors.
These animals were termed second creation subjects.
As any psychologist will tell you that before psychopaths harm humans undefined they first do their acts of cruelty on animals. These tests of course were not the only unethical tests that were carried out by the government in the 20th century.
Other experiments included the exposure of people to chemical and biological weapons including infection of people with deadly or debilitating diseases, injection of people with toxic and radioactive chemicals, surgical experiments, interrogation and torture experiments, tests involving mind-altering substances, and a wide variety of others. Many of these tests were performed on children, the sick and mentally disabled individuals, often under the guise of “medical treatment.” In many of the studies, a large portion of the subjects were poor, racial minorities, or prisoners.
The human research programs were usually highly secretive, and in many cases, information about them were not released until many years after the studies had been performed.
The ethical, professional, and legal implications of this in the United States medical and scientific community were quite significant, and led to many institutions and policies that attempted to ensure that future human subject research in the United States would be ethical and legal. Public outrage in the late 20th century over the discovery of government experiments on human subjects led to numerous congressional investigations and hearings, including the Church Committee in 1975 and the 1994 Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, among others.
Now, in the 21st century, many people look back and wonder how our nation could be so inhumane as to release radiation and toxic substances on its own people? In fact the United States government has launched attacks on countries that we have assumed have used chemical weapons against their own people which I might add was all done in the name of science and national security.
Recently, there was news about a doctoral dissertation that renewed public interest in the military-sponsored chemical spraying of impoverished areas of St. Louis in the 1950s and ’60s has spawned a lawsuit.
Undisputed is that St. Louis was among several test cities chosen decades ago by government contractors for the spraying of zinc cadmium sulfide, a chemical powder mixed with fluorescent particles to allow tracking of dispersal patterns. The spraying was part of a biological weapons program, the government conceded in 1994, and St. Louis was chosen because its topography was similar to some of the Russian cities the military thought it might have to attack.
Residents were told by military scientists that it was testing “a smoke screen” for protection in enemy attack. These so called tests are called Gain of Function exercises undefined where scientists under the direction of the military or even a pharmaceutical company take part on an experiment where people are actually infected with a biological or viral substance in order to monitor the spread and its effects.
In recent years, some members of the scientific community have been involved in a vigorous debate over so-called “gain-of-function” experiments involving pathogens with pandemic potential, such as influenza virus. Proponents and opponents of GOF work engaged in extensive discussion about the value, safety, ethics, and validity of this type of research.
In a Military Gain of Function exercise, the fog in San Francisco was used as a cover in order to see whether it could be used to help spread a biological weapon in a “simulated germ-warfare attack.”
Over a period of six days in September 1950, members of the US Navy sprayed clouds of Serratia from giant hoses aboard a Navy minesweeper drifting two miles along the San Francisco coastline, a bacterial fog quickly enveloped and disguised by the region’s own fog. By monitoring the air at 43 scattered sites throughout the region, the Navy found Serratia bacteria blown throughout San Francisco and extending to the adjacent communities of Albany, Berkeley, Daly City, Colma, Oakland, San Leandro, and Sausalito.
In this regard, the experiment was a success: the San Francisco Bay was identified as a highly-susceptible site for a germ warfare attack and a quantifiable range for the airborne dispersal of microbes was established. A 1951 military report on the experiment summarized the findings: “It was noted that a successful BW [biological warfare] attack on this area can be launched from the sea, and that effective dosages can be produced over relatively large areas.”
It was estimated that the city’s 800,000 residents had each received a heavy dose of Serratia, inhaling millions of bacteria throughout the testing period. In its report, the military further concluded “that Serratia marcescens is so rarely a cause of illness, and the illness resulting is predominantly so trivial, that its use as a simulant should be continued, even over populated areas.”
In 1977, a flu virus swept the world in an event that became known as the Russian flu. It was caused by a strain of flu that, later genetic tests showed, looked remarkably like those that had circulated in 1950. The belief is that the virus escaped from a laboratory during a gain of function exercise.
Gain of function exercises may also include the deliberate releasing of a disease in order to gauge and effective way of switching it off.
In the Summer of 1984, a force multiplied strain of Brucellosis was tested at Tahoe-Truckee High School in California. The teachers’ lounge was the target area. Seven of the eight teachers assigned to the room became very ill within months. There were other undisclosed locations where the pathogen was tested using an airborne aerosolized delivery system and contaminated mosquitoes.
These clandestine tests were conducted by the CIA and were closely monitored by the National Institute of Health and the CDC. Encouraged by what was seen, the U.S. government passed the newly modified Brucellosis strain to Saddam Hussein to use against Iran in 1986, with the approval of Vice-President George Bush.
Saddam received shipments of both Brucella Abortus, Biotypes 3 and 9, and Brucella Melitensis, Biotypes 1 and 3.
After our good “friend” and CIA operative Saddam Hussein became our enemy during the Gulf War of 1991, he used this pathogen on American troops resulting in the illness referred to as Gulf War Syndrome. More than 100,000 Gulf War vets now suffer from this syndrome, which causes chronic fatigue, loss of appetite, profuse sweating, joint and muscle pain, insomnia, nausea, and damage to major organs.
Troops initially were told that no such infection existed and that the problem was mostly in their mind. Slowly, over the years, authorities were forced to admit that something had triggered severe illness in many Gulf War veterans. By then, a variant of the modified Brucellosis had spread to the civilian population.
Gulf War Syndrome was a result of something doctors tried to dismiss as a fallacy along with Chronic fatigue syndrome.
Today we are now facing our own set of syndromes that have been created by politifact science instead of transparent fact finding for the benefit of the people.
COVID-19 has gone from a health issue to a terror campaign.
It is a campaign that seeks to decimate any remaining human closeness, which means any remaining humanity as such, the better to isolate individual atoms for subjection to total domination.
Far more profoundly and evoking despair, the terror campaign is a virus causing those it infects to fear and loathe all human contact, all companionship, all closeness, all things which ever made us human in the first place. Prior totalitarian regimes sought this lack of contact and trust through networks of informers.
These networks are part of today’s terror campaign as well, encouraged from above and spontaneously arising from below as a result of the feeling of terror as well as the exercise of prior petty-evil intentions on the part of petty-evil individuals.
But today’s totalitarian potential is far worse than this. Now the regimes aspiring to total domination have terrorized and brainwashed the vast majority of people into an automatic physical distrust of all other people. One no longer fears that someone is an informer, but fears the very existence of another human being.
Any kind of human relations, from personal friendship and romance to friendly social gatherings and clubs to social and cultural movements become impossible under such circumstances. This threatens to be the end of the very concept of shared humanity.
So far the people are submitting completely to a terror campaign dedicated to the total eradication of whatever community was left in the world, and especially whatever community was starting to be rebuilt.
It is another case of science - force diagnosing you with and Iatrogenic artifact – the cure is worse that the disease. They have the majority terrified so that they will be more than happy to line up for a vaccine that has been rushed through the trials and without any indication that it will cause serious if not fatal side effects.
So far it seems this is what the majority wants. If they don’t really want this consummation of universal death in spirit, emotion and body, they’d better snap out of their terror-induced mental delirium fast, before it’s too late.
