MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
I cannot count how many times I have gone on the air to warn people that there are machinations in the works that are going to change our lives dramatically. The call out to be prepared is not just a ploy to sell vitamins or nonperishable food items. It is a very important matter when you start to understand how in the future those who are in control are going to weaponize food and drugs. The way they do it is to create shortages of one item in order to force you into taking another item that may be less desirable.
Making choices is necessary, but not always easy. Many of our expressions talk about this difficulty.
One of those expressions for having no real choice is between a rock and a hard place. It is often used to describe a difficult situation with few choices, none of them good.
There is still another expression that describes a situation with only bad choices, being on the horns of a dilemma.
The dictionary says a dilemma is a situation in which you must make a decision about two equally balanced choices. When your dilemma has horns, a choice becomes impossible. When you are on the horns of a dilemma, no matter which horn you choose, something bad will happen.
Then there is the popular Catch-22 a dilemma or difficult circumstance from which there is no escape because of mutually conflicting or dependent conditions.
Finally, there is the expression behind the 8 ball where another dilemma with no real choice vexes you undefined and so you have to come up with some plan that is going to give you the least harm.
In the future you are going to have to make uncomfortable choices as people will be forced into paramorality or apocalyptic morality.
The biggest dilemma that will face us in the near future is scarcity and it appears that conditions are being forced on us to make decisions that will not be popular or comfortable.
Just days ago, we warned you of the Cyber Polygon exercise that was to be carried out on July 9th by The World Economic Forum.
The World Economic Forum will stage a cyber-attack gain of function exercise as it continues to prep for a potential cyber pandemic that founder Klaus Schwab says will be worse than the current global crisis.
Schwab has been thinking out loud about what would be worse that COVID-19 and his answer is a supply chain attack created by cyber terrorists.
Schwab stated that “a cyber-attack with COVID-like characteristics would spread faster and farther than any biological virus.”
We have already seen how a ransomware attack crippled the Colonial Pipeline which triggered gas shortages and panic buying across the eastern United States.
Now another attack threatens the meat supply,
A cyberattack on JBS USA, the largest meat producer globally, has forced the shutdown of some of world’s largest slaughterhouses, and there are signs that the closures are spreading.
JBS’s five biggest beef plants in the U.S., which altogether handle 22,500 cattle a day, have halted processing following a weekend attack on the company’s computer networks, according to JBS posts on Facebook, labor unions and employees. Those outages alone have wiped out nearly a fifth of America’s production. Slaughter operations across Australia were also down, according to a trade group. One of Canada’s largest beef plants was idled for a second day.
It is unclear exactly how many plants globally have been affected by the attack as JBS has yet to release details that granular. The prospect of more extensive shutdowns around the world is already upending agricultural markets and raising concerns about food security as hackers increasingly target critical infrastructure. In the U.S., JBS accounts for about a quarter of all U.S. beef capacity and roughly a fifth of all pork capacity. Livestock futures slumped while pork prices rose.
JBS suspended its North American and Australian computer systems after an organized assault on Sunday on some of its servers, the Brazilian meat giant said Monday in an emailed statement. Without commenting on operations at its plants, JBS said the incident may delay certain transactions with customers and suppliers.
This again indicates a pattern- a pattern that I really canundefinedt believe no one has picked up on undefined or dares to expose.
I want to remind everyone that before we were scared into compliance of COVID-19 restrictions there were policies and ideas being proposed for a green deal which included a cashless society, decreased air travel, decreased use of fossil fuels, population control, mass surveillance, decreased meat production and others have all been on the agenda since long before COVID was close to becoming a thing…and have all been mooted as ways to fight this pandemic or “future pandemics”.
However now population control, decreased use of fossil fuels are seemingly being neatly carried out or forced into operation because of the proposed great reset.
Even the Great Reset actually pre-dates the pandemic.
After all, what is the much talked about “green new deal”, if not a prototype of the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset plan?
Recently, Climate activist, Greta Thunberg, released a video saying that meat eating is stealing her and her generationundefineds future.
She stated that eating meat, dairy, and eggs is bad for climate. She goes on to say that livestock production is one of the greatest drivers of climate change.
The 16-year-old Swedish activist explained in an interview that she persuaded her parents to ditch animal products for the good of the planet and her generation’s future.
Here it is six month into 2021 and as planned we are already seeing that if a climate of scarcity does not happen on its own undefined it will certainly be pushed in that direction.
it is a conspiracy that writes itself. First there is an attack on an oil pipeline that supplies fossil fuels to the east coast-and now an attack on a meat suppler that will most definitely create a shortage of meat and jack up an already inflated price for all meats at the grocery store,
As food prices continue to rise, beef and pork have surged out front.
Overall food prices rose 0.4 percent from March, and are up 1 percent from a year ago, according to data released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis on Friday. The price of pork soared 2.6 percent in the month of April and 4.8 percent from a year ago, adjusting for seasonality. And while beef and veal prices stayed fairly flat for the month, they are up 3.3 percent from a year ago.
In a season that routinely sees increased demand for beef and pork, this goes far beyond people excited to get back outside to barbecue.
If you recall, there was a story dubbed a conspiracy theory by the media that stated that President Joe Bidenundefineds climate plan demanded that Americans drastically reduce the amount of meat they eat.
Meat is, and long has been, one of America’s fiercest political battlegrounds and while many PolitiFact checkers tried to downplay the meat conspiracy, it is evident that there are activities happening that give the technocratic planners of the undefinednew normalundefined plausible deniability.
Sure you are told there is no direct conspiracy with the Biden administration and that may be true undefined but it seems a little outside help is giving a solid push for scarcity which is all part of the plan for the great recent and the conspiracy to starve Americans into submission.
Prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, I have urged my listeners to prepare with nonperishable food items because the goal of the technocrats is to create scarcity of certain food stuffs and replace them with alternatives that will not be too pleasant.
From the examples of Big Mac economics to petroleum shortages we have seen what can only be called supply chain terrorism that is forcing us into accepting what can be called green alternatives.
Usually, it is a difficult task as a conspiracy theory researcher to convince people that psychological operations are real and effective tools that elite use to steer the public and the public consciousness to an approximated goal.
I want to point out that there is a massive psychological operation underway and when I point it out to you it will convince you that there is most certainly a manipulative project underway- to convince people that they are going to have to find alternatives to proteins that do not include the consumption of meat.
I believe that if it can be pointed out early on – we can identify it before virtue signalers use it to vilify people who are just being normal in times where we are told that we need to abide by what is called “the new normal.”
No matter what party is in power psychological operations are not at all being pushed by a president or a vice president, they come from the national security complex and after the successful grooming of the population — the leaders look over the agenda and then they pass laws or mandates in order to satiate the real law makers at the Pentagon.
However there needs to be a fool proof dialectic to frighten people into abiding by new and restrictive guidelines. We have now become all too familiar with how the act is carried out undefined we have seen the terror operation with COVID-19 where propaganda designed to terrify us has now compelled people into accepting without question a vaccine that no one will know what it will do to them years from now.
Now it appears that as COVID-19 passes into history- there is now waiting in the wings the new crisis. A crisis where scarcity is created in order to somehow change the direction of our so called out of control climate. The goal is to eliminate the use of fossil fuels, and to change the diets of people all over the world in order to achieve planetary sustainability.
This is all in line with several plans that were proposed in the past to literally starve the nation into submission.
On Dec. 10, 1974, the U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger completed a classified 200-page study, “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.”
The study falsely claimed that population growth in the so-called Lesser Developed Countries was a grave threat to U.S. national security. Adopted as official policy in November 1975 by President Gerald Ford, National Security Study Memorandum outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in those countries through birth control, and also, implicitly, war and famine.
Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as National security Adviser (the same post-Scowcroft was to hold in the Bush administration), was put in charge of implementing the plan.
CIA Director George Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the secretaries of state, treasury, defense, and agriculture.
National Security Study Memorandum 200 similarly concluded that the United States was threatened by population growth and that measure had to be taken to lessen the population of the United States or that we would be forced to regulate vital resources like food and water.
There were several measures that Kissinger advocated to deal with this alleged threat, most prominently, birth control and related population-reduction programs. He also warned that “population growth rates are likely to increase appreciably before they begin to decline,” even if such measures were adopted.
A second measure was curtailing food supplies to targeted states, in part to force compliance with birth control policies: he stated that “There is also some established precedent for taking account of family planning performance in appraisal of assistance requirements by AID U.S. Agency for International Development and consultative groups.
He stated that population growth is a major determinant of increases in food demand.
“Mandatory programs may be needed, and we should be considering these possibilities now,” the document continued, adding, “Would food be considered an instrument of national power? … Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can’t/won’t control their population growth?”
Kissinger also predicted a return of famines could make exclusive reliance on birth control programs unnecessary. In other words, it would be advantageous to create famine in order to curtail birth and thus reduce the population.
Kissinger was clearly advocating starving people in the United States.
He clearly stated that the resource depletion would have to appear to be natural and quite possibly connected to an environmental impact on agricultural yields.
The cyber-attack on JBS USA wiped out nearly a fifth of America’s beef production.
Bloomberg points out JBS closed meat processing facilities in Utah, Texas, Wisconsin, and Nebraska and eliminated shifts at Iowa and Colorado shifts on the day after Memorial Day.
You can see how all of this is bad timing as meat consumption is higher in the summer because of holiday eating and backyard barbeques.
This one-two punch of hacking incidents against the oil supply and meat supply is showing a pattern. A pattern that can be found in an agenda that was first put together at a summit conducted by the United Nations.
If you recall in 2015, there were plans set in place by the United Nations 2030 Summit stating that the American diet would have to change and that would include a drastic reduction in meat consumption.
The United Nation’s stated that there should be dietary guidelines in place for the entire world which includes the regulations of animal-based proteins.
Before the Climate debate was replaced with the COVID-19 debate, there was a push for the 2030 ideal diet proposed by the technocrats which literally limits and then virtually eliminates animal proteins from the human diet.
The thing that is most disconcerting is at least one in five people could not afford science’s ‘ideal diet’ designed to feed 10 billion people without hurting the planet, according to a study.
It recommended people double their intake of nuts, fruit, vegetables, and legumes, and eat half as much meat and sugar to prevent millions of early deaths, cut greenhouse gas emissions and preserve land, water, and biodiversity.
Contingent on World Bank aid to be given to poorer countries in the wake of coronavirus lockdowns, agri-food conglomerates will aim to further expand their influence. These firms have been integral to the consolidation of a global food regime that has emerged in recent decades based on chemical- and proprietary-input-dependent agriculture which incurs massive externalized social, environmental and health costs.
Reliance on commodity monocropping for global markets, long supply chains and dependency on external inputs for cultivation make the food system vulnerable to shocks, whether resulting from public health scares, oil price spikes (the global food system is fossil-fuel dependent) cyber-attacks or conflict and war.
An increasing number of countries are recognizing the need to respond by becoming more food self-sufficient, preferably by securing control over their own food and reducing supply chain lengths.
It is more than obvious that these attacks will continue. The supply chains will become the targets. When supply chains are attacked sufficiently, attacks on infrastructure will be next – just in time for the Cyber Polygon analysis.
I hope that you are seeing what is happening and that you have the means to figure out what is coming next—COVID-19 is passing away and we are passing into the next magical scarcity tour of transformation.
