A crucial matter is how body autonomy, vaccines, and abortion are all issues that spell out a campaign for population reduction. The groundwork being laid with mandates and abortion laws is a prologue to what will become the police state’s conquest of a new, relatively uncharted, frontier: inner space, specifically, the inner workings of genetic, biological, biometric, mental, and emotional aspects of the human race. They possess the ability to trigger the populace, terrorize it, and now, attack its vital core. Tonight on Ground Zero, Clyde Lewis talks about MINISTRY OF PURITY.
SHOW SAMPLE:
SHOW PODCAST:
https://aftermath.media/podcast/5-16-22-ministry-of-purity/
SHOW TRANSCRIPT:
This weekend, I was tied up in getting the house prepared for Janine and Liamundefineds return from the UK. My study time was curtailed because of all of the housework. I did manage to take a break and watch some news items and of course, most of what was on the news dealt with this horrible shooting that took place in a predominantly black neighborhood in New York. I paused for a moment and looked that the numbers involved undefined 13 victims after Friday the 13th and Blood Moon as well. Certainly, there are hidden ritualism clues to go over but I did not have the time so I may have to take some time later to understand this whole scenario.
The aftermath of this shooting will be with us for a while and of course, there will be copycats, where the media will call for more gun control and controls on what can be expressed on the internet.
In the meantime, there is something else that I think is very troubling especially when it comes to body autonomy-and of course, the abortion issues that have now triggered both the left and right and have become empty campaign points on various political commercials.
An extremely important issue is now how body autonomy, vaccines, and abortion are all issues that spell out a campaign for population reduction.
Body autonomy laws are going to be the next move and while we can all argue about abortion today — we will also need to remember that Body autonomy also includes fight laws requiring all points along the continuum. Abortion, vaccine mandates, transhumanism, transgender laws and even assisted suicide are all part of the umbrella that cover body autonomy.
These battles over vaccine mandates were merely a tipping point. The groundwork being laid with these mandates and abortion laws are a prologue to what will become the police state’s conquest of a new, relatively uncharted, frontier: inner space, specifically, the inner workings genetic, biological, biometric, mental, emotional of the human race.
They know that they have the ability to trigger the populace, terrorize it and now attack itundefineds vital core. They can starve babies and deprive them of formula in order to force them into drinking a more genetic slew of Soylent green.
There is a new company called BIOMILQ now has what they call a nutritionally comparable alternative to human breast milk — except this milk isn’t produced in a mammary gland, but in a bioreactor.
For parents who can’t breastfeed or who adopted or used surrogates, having another option for their children besides formula milk could be a game-changer. It’s also very common for women to not be able to produce enough breast milk on their own.
It is also ready to save us from our formula scarcity.
Both Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg are investors.
Now, would you trust a product endorsed by a well-known Malthusian Billionaire who spent time - a lot of time at Jeffery Epstein’s bio sex eugenics ranch?
Population reduction and eugenics policies are a very important issue because it is happening now and some people just shrug it off undefined but they shouldn’t.
You may not see this now — but all of these issues have been discussed in many of our well known science fiction stories.
There is a TV series called Mani In the High castle. It is a Philip K, Dick story that was made into a series undefined it is a what if type of show where in another timeline that Axis powers won World War II.
If one can put aside Hollywood’s ubiquitous attempt at re-education, this series becomes very interesting for the pro-lifer who is against the killing of the weakest. In addition to the systematic slaughter of the Jews, the Nazis were notorious for cleansing the society of those they saw as a burden on society.
One of the most striking scenes appears in the first season where one of the main characters is talking to a police officer on the side of the road. The cop is eating a sandwich as it starts snowing. But it is not snow. Ashes are falling like snowflakes on both men as they converse:
The main character Joe Blake says to the cop:
What is that?
The cop replies Oh, thatundefineds the hospital.
The hospital? asks Joe.
The officer smiles and says Yeah, Tuesdays, they burn cripplesundefined the terminally ill. Drag on the state.
The cop continues to eat without interruption, while the other is horrified.
This scene paints a vivid image of what normalization of an atrocity looks like. More often, however, there are no ashes. The killing continues without interruption behind closed doors in the name of choice and freedom. Terms like health care are thrown around to make sure that most of the society continues to eat sandwiches while thousands die daily.
Oh but the discussion is not limited to abortions undefined you can also surmise that there are a number of older people that have left this planet undefined because of neglect, and how they were the main casualties of Covid-19 undefined that along with the obese and those whit comorbidities undefined they to have been called a drag on the system.
Another striking plot line within the larger story revolves around one of the high-ranking officials of the American Reich, Obergruppenführer John Smith. Smith’s son, Thomas, is diagnosed with a congenital disorder that renders him unsuitable for the future of the Aryan race. Smith and his wife are devastated when they hear Thomas’ diagnosis, because as loyal Nazis, they are supposed to turn their own son in to be euthanized in order to preserve racial purity. Smith does all he can to save his son, but at the end of the second season (spoiler alert!) Thomas finds out about his disorder.
As a Nazi youth who has been indoctrinated about the ultimate goal of racial purity, he turns himself in to be killed. In the third season, we see that his death unravels his parents, both of whom start questioning the Reich’s eugenicist policies.
Thomas was told from an early age that those with less-than-desirable genetic makeup should be sacrificed for the greater good of the Reich. Over and over for decades, this is what young men and women grew up on.
Normalization and indoctrination are two indispensable components of Nazi build back better efforts.
The viewer of this TV show is supposed to be appalled at the cruelty of this alternate world
You are supposed to be shocked and terrified, because it is obvious that even though the Reich was obliterated, its eugenics policies are alive and well in our progressive enlightened society.
However it is not as organized as it was with the Reich undefined and the government endorsed it religiously- we tell ourselves that this can’t happen here undefined but itis happening here it is just that anyone who reveals it is called a disinformationalist or conspiracy theorist.
We live in times where one person’s choice means another’s death. We also live in tines where governments make choices for you that can lead to your death undefined as they propose that you take untested poisons into your body undefined and now we are seeing that not only is there going to be a ministry of truth in our future but a ministry of purity very much like what Hitler had to take care of those who he saw as a drag on the system.
I had already produced two shows about my concerns regarding Euthanasia in Canada -and how the government will encourage you to get a doctor assisted suicide if you are a burden on the system undefined and the 80,000 page Pfizer dump that spoke of vaccination trials on pregnant women,
When governments started “recommending” the Covid vaccine to pregnant women in the Summer of 2021, everybody who had been paying attention knew that position was not backed up by any data at all.
Remember when I said the whole Roe vs. Wade leak was just a trigger and that the real issue was body autonomy — not just for women but for the vaccine.
According to Pfizer dump the vaccines were never tested on pregnant women, they were never properly tested on anybody. It takes 10 years to safely produce and trial a vaccine, not 18 months. And what “trials” they claim to have done in that year and a half were a complete sham.
In fact there was worry that the vaccine would harm the fetus.
The confidential Pfizer documents that the FDA have been forced to publish by court order reveal that 82% to 97% of women who were mistakenly exposed to the mRNA Covid-19 injection either suffered a miscarriage or suffered having to witness the death of their newborn child upon giving birth.
But Pfizer claimed – “There were no safety signals that emerged from the review of these cases of use in pregnancy”.
One of the documents contained in the data dump is ‘reissue_5.3.6 post marketing experience.pdf’. Page 12 of the confidential document contains data on the use of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection in pregnancy and lactation.
Pfizer states in the document that by 28th February 2021 there were 270 known cases of exposure to the mRNA injection during pregnancy.
One-hundred-and-forty-six of those mother cases did not immediately report the immediate occurrence of any clinical adverse event. But 124 of the 270 mother cases did. Meaning 46% of the mothers exposed to the Pfizer Covid-19 injection suffered an adverse reaction.
Of those 124 mothers suffering an adverse reaction, 49 were considered non-serious adverse reactions, whereas 75 were considered serious. This means 58% of the mothers who reported suffering adverse reactions suffered a serious adverse event ranging from uterine contraction to fetal death.
Reports of Women Shedding Uterine Lining Surged in 2021, according to new research.
Three members of the Children’s Health Defense team — Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer, Sue Peters, Ph.D., senior research fellow and Heather Ray, scientific administrator — conducted research for a paper published April 21 in the Gazette of Medical Sciences.
Hooker, Peters and Ray worked with My Cycle Story, a multidisciplinary, collaborative research project involving 13 scientists and physicians, on a survey that found an increase in 2021 in reports of “decidual cast shedding.”
Decidual cast shedding refers to a condition where the entire lining of the uterus is passed at once.
A decidual cast may occur when a cessation of progesterone levels results in the loss of support for the decidualized endometrial lining. This causes a synchronized detachment of the entire lining, which then passes through the cervix and vagina
The My Cycle Story survey of 6,049 females found 292 reported cases of decidual cast shedding between May 16, 2021, and Dec. 31, 2021.
The results of the survey, which was conducted on social media, contrasted with the pre-pandemic period, where a total of 40 cases were found in the medical literature over the past 109 years.
The survey was launched based on previous survey data suggesting an increase in menstrual irregularities since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.
As survey responses accumulated, it became evident that individuals were reporting a variety of unusual symptoms, many severe, and that decidual cast shedding was prevalent within the survey responses.
The study authors affirmed through Google metadata a 2,000% increase in the search terms “decidual cast shedding” during the first two quarters of 2021.
The authors also concluded more research is needed to understand the factors involved in the increase in decidual cast shedding in 2021. The My Cycle Story team seeks to develop a deeper understanding of this phenomenon as well as other menstrual irregularities associated with the pandemic.
Roe V Wade is making headlines, and the triggered response is to motivate the voters undefined but babies are dying due to vaccine experiments undefined and so we not only see this in babies but older people are now being urges to keep getting boosters of the vaccine,,
Bill Gates this weekend appeared on CNN and told Anderson Cooper’s audience that people over the age of 50 will probably have to get Covid boosters every 6 months until we get a better vaccine.
“For people over 50 or 60, they’ll probably have to be boosted every 6 months until we get even better vaccines,” Bill Gates said. Anderson Cooper asked Bill Gates a follow up question on Covid booster shots as if he was interviewing a medical expert.
“I’ve been trying to figure this out for myself – I assume you know the answer to this so I’ll just ask you, when do you get boosted again?” Anderson Cooper asked Bill Gates.
“It’ll be safe every six months…they might even make that shorter for people over 60 or 70… so we’re in for ongoing vaccination to stay absolutely safe.”
This is an example of how the media is clueless when it comes to deciding what is disinformation and what isnundefinedt undefined Gates in not a doctor and yet he acts like one on TV and the media lest him get away with it.
Just days before, FDA chief Dr. Robert Califf appeared on CNN and asserted that the leading cause of death in the United States is online “misinformation.”
Califf spoke about his remarks during an interview with CNN’s Pamela Brown, which were originally made at a health conference in Texas last month when he said online misinformation was “now our leading cause of death.”
After admitting that there was “no way to quantify this,” before mentioning heart disease and cancer (actual killers), Califf went on to bolster the claim anyway.
Claiming that there has been “an erosion of life expectancy,” Califf went on to say that Americans were living an average of 5 years shorter than people in other high income countries.
Califf said that anti-virals and vaccinations meant “almost no one in this country should be dying from COVID,” before going on to explain that there was also a “reduction in life expectancy from common diseases like heart disease.”
“But somehow … the reliable, truthful messages are not getting across,” he said, adding, “And it’s being washed down by a lot of misinformation, which is leading people to make bad choices that are unfortunate for their health.”
The FDA chief did not explain how ‘online misinformation’ was causing more deaths from heart disease, but went ahead and made the claim anyway without being challenged by the host.
Of course “online misinformation” is indistinguishable from information the regime doesn’t like.
The contrived moral panic over “misinformation” has become more pronounced following Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter, with CNN guests recently complaining about how it might impact their monopoly on controlling “the channels of communications.”
And of course we have to also acknowledge that the Boden administration has created a ministry of Truth undefined so that ugly revelations are not uttered by people who want to bring down the current administration and reveal just how tyrannical and despotic they are.
Even though a recent poll has declared that COVid-19 is no longer of concern by most people those in power are still hanging on to it as a threat undefined stating that at anytime we could go back to the way things were -and that there has to be more power given to the medical surveillance state in order to retain full spectrum control.
While the ghoulish daily press announcements about infections and deaths across the country have diminished and, in some cases, disappeared altogether, publications abound about how many were taken in the pandemic.
There are also leaked documents that reveal some pretty awful things about the vaccine and that it has potential side effects that can contribute to population reduction.
The World Health Organization, ever that herald of dark news, has offered a revised assessment across of the SARS-CoV-2 death toll associated either directly or indirectly with the pandemic. Between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021, the global health body suggests that the mortality figure is closer to 14.9 million, with a range of 13.3 million to 16.6 million.
The number considers excess mortality, the figure reached after accounting for the difference between the number of deaths that have occurred, and the number expected in the absence of the pandemic. It also accounts for deaths occasioned directly by COVID-19, or indirectly (for instance, the pandemic’s disruption of society and health systems).
The impact, as expected, has been disproportionate in terms of which countries have suffered more. Of the excess deaths, 68% were concentrated in 10 countries – Brazil, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Peru, Russia, South Africa, Turkey, and the United States. Middle-income countries accounted for 81% of excess deaths; high-income countries, for 15%, and low-income countries, 4%.
The United States, if only for being ascendant in terms of power, wealth, and incompetence in dealing with the virus, finds itself in the undistinguished position of having lost a million people.
Anthony Fauci, rued the fact that “at least a quarter of those deaths, namely about 250,000” might have been saved by vaccinations. He also warned about the ugly prospect of a resurgence in numbers, and not bringing “down our guard”.
In light of such figures, WHO Director-General, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, reiterates the line he and his colleagues have done so for months. Pandemics demand more “resilient health systems that can sustain essential health services during crises, including stronger health information systems”.
On May 22-28, the 75th World Health Assembly will convene at United Nations (U.N.) headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, with delegates from 194 nations, to vote on the Biden administration’s amendments that will hand over national sovereignty and authority to the WHO.
On Jan. 18, 2022, officials from the Biden administration quietly sent the WHO extensive amendments without an official statement or a single press conference. These proposed amendments are written to strengthen the organization’s ability to unilaterally intervene into the affairs of nations merely suspected of having a “health emergency” of possible concern to other nations. If these amendments are approved, the WHO will have the power to declare an “international health emergency,” nullifying the powers of nation states.
This means that the WHO can circumvent our constitution if they declare a health emergency.
The U.S. amendments delete a critical existing restriction in the regulations: “WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring…” This enables the Director-General to declare health emergencies at will and can be used to justify ostracism and economic or financial actions against the targeted nation by other nations aligned with WHO or who wish to harm and control the accused nation.
The contents of the proposed amendments were not made public until April 12 2022,. The existing WHO regulations provide for an 18-month grace period during which a nation may withdraw its “yes” vote for amendments. However, the current proposed amendments would reduce that opportunity to six months. If the amendments are passed, a majority of the nations could change their individual votes and reverse the approval in the next months.
“Covid-19: Make It the Last Pandemic,” a report published by the United Nations in May 2021, claims that the “pandemic” would have been prevented if the WHO had been given more global authority. The report states, “In its current form, the WHO does not possess such powers …To move on with the treaty, WHO therefore needs to be empowered — financially, and politically… The treaty should possess an adaptable incentive regime, [including] sanctions such as public reprimands, economic sanctions, or denial of benefits.”
On Jan. 20, 2021, Joe Biden sent a letter to António Guterres, U.N.’s secretary-general and member of the Portuguese Socialist Party, retracting President Donald Trump’s withdrawal from the WHO. Biden also appointed Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, to represent the United States on the WHO’s executive committee.
In March 2020, the WHO pushed democratic nations to implement lockdowns, mandates, vaccine passports, digital “health” surveillance, etc. In fact, the WHO has developed guidance and even technical specifications for member states to adopt “interoperable standards” for COVID-19 vaccine passports. Labeled “interim guidance,” the WHO’s latest release pushes new digital vaccine passports to be used on a global scale. The WHO openly states these personalized digital documents could “be extended to capture vaccination status to protect against other diseases” and may “be used for continuity of care or as proof of vaccination for purposes other than health care,” such as employment, university education and international travel.
This means that the Biden administration has now set America up for cede U.S. sovereignty concerning the health of Americans to the World Health Organization. The proposed amendments would give the WHO global jurisdiction over the United States including the authority to declare national emergencies.
One of the reasons this pandemic has felt so novel, is because for most of our lives the state has used the pretext of national security to enact its larger programs we are told that these programs are being installed to protect the public interest and the public health undefined but this is simply a ruse to hide the fact that much of what has been happening is population reduction and demise of cognitive liberty and body autonomy.
Throughout history from Hitler to Mao we can find historical quotes that put a value on the use of terror to keep the people in line.
Now our tyrannical leaders discovered that biological terror trumps military terror as a tool of population control.
Fear of an invisible virus is far more easily universalized than fear of a radical Islamist emerging from a cave to blow up your town square.
The virus can kill with a sneeze.
Now there is much we do know, particularly regarding generalized risk and its use as a rationale for the abdication of democratic norms.
The majority of people those who followed through with the requests of their government to be vaccinated -will not understand why they will have to be punished again if the World Health Organization decides to round up certain demographics for forced inoculations of experimental vaccines regardless of their side effects.
You will have no rights because President Biden signed them away- at the stroke of a pen he enabled a health security mandate which can easily be seen as a health authority that analyses purity undefined genetic purity, and physical purity -all other can be jailed or worse.
What is happening appears to be similar to what the Nazis called the Tiergarten Fier health reforms where doctors would performed Eugenics practices with the blessings of the Reich,
Looking back into the darker annals of history we see that after the Nuremberg Hearings we saw 7 of the 23 Nazi doctors put to death for their role in Hitler’s Tiergarten Fier health reforms, Nuremberg counsel Dr. Leo Alexander wrote in 1949:
“Whatever proportions these crimes finally assumed; it became evident to all who investigated them that they had started from small beginnings. The beginnings at first were merely a subtle shift in emphasis in basic attitude, basic in the euthanasia movement, that there is such a thing as life not worthy to be lived. This attitude in its early stages concerned itself merely with the severely and chronically sick.
Gradually, the sphere of those to be included in this category was enlarged to encompass the socially unproductive, the ideologically unwanted, the racially unwanted, then finally all non-Germans. But it is important to realize that the infinitely small wedged-in lever from which this entire trend of mind received its impetus was the attitude toward the non-rehabilitate sick”
In his essay, Dr. Alexander described the growth of the euthanasia laws in fascist Germany as the concept “lives unworthy of life” was first introduced into health policy. Under the guidance of “expert panels”, the T4 health codes soon became a driving force of eugenics that saw 270,000 non-Jewish Germans killed starting with handicapped children and elderly before the policy was expanded to embrace Jews, Gypsies and other target “unfit” group.
The fact that the organizations promoting the rise of this eugenics policy throughout Nazi Germany and North America included such powerhouses as the Rockefeller Foundation, the Wellcome Trust and the Human Sterilization League for Human Betterment (today renamed “Engender Health”) which have all taken leading roles in the World Health Organization over recent decades is more than a little concerning.
The fact that these eugenics organizations simply re-branded themselves after WWII and are now implicated in modern RNA vaccine development alongside the Galton Institute (formerly British Eugenics Association), Oxford’s AstraZeneca, Pfizer and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation should give any serious thinker pause as we consider what patterns of history we are willing to tolerate repeating in our presently precarious age.
By 2030, it is currently estimated people over the age of 85 will triple while seniors between 65-85 will double. The financial costs of sustaining this demographic will skyrocket as healthcare services double from their currently massive $1.4 trillion/year to $3 trillion/year by 2050 (in the USA).
As cost-effectiveness experts look at this dismal trend, all they can see is a cold numbers game.
These experts don’t tend to see humans with cognitive powers and souls and they certainly don’t recognize the existence of such immaterial notions as the “sacred” which might prevent the culling of lives in order to satisfy monetary constraints.
They certainly don’t recognize the injustices of a system that allows trillions of dollars to be spent sending weapons to Ukraine -which the war effort is just another method to cull undesirable populations that have been seen as a burden on Eastern Europe.
These experts can only think in terms of adapting to scarcity and supposedly “fixed limits” but never eliminating scarcity through systemic changes that place human life and creative thought on a higher priority than mere money.
Now it appears that populations are now being targeted and are being reduced. The excuse is that we need resiliency in bioethics
What many do not know, however, is that the seemingly benign academic study of bioethics has its roots in the dark history of eugenics.
With that knowledge, the dangers inherent in entrusting some of the most important discussions about the life, death and health of humanity in the hands of a select few become even more apparent.
undefined
undefined
undefined
undefined
