As the 8 billionth human entered the planet this month, renewed discussions about population growth and global sustainability agendas by the worldundefineds policymakers have come to the forefront. The idea of “sifting human material” and culling those who are a burden on society and replaced by manageable humans with superior genetic traits was something Hitler dreamed of yet now, is coming closer to reality with elitists Bill Gates, Klaus Shwaub, Elon Musk, and others, proposing the need to control human evolution. Slowly but surely, babies will be born unto this world as saviors and the chosen ones. Tonight on Ground Zero, Clyde Lewis talks about FOR UNTO YOU IS BORN.
SHOW SAMPLE:
SHOW PODCAST:
https://aftermath.media/podcast/11-28-22-for-unto-you-is-born/
SHOW TRANSCRIPT:
World Economic Forum founder and Chair Klaus Schwab recently sat down for an interview with a Chinese state media outlet and proclaimed that China was a undefinedrole modelundefined for other nations. We have known for some time that the U.N. States years ago in Brazil that the new model for world government would be the Chinese model where a new kind of communism would arrive with stakeholders keeping capitalism on a leash.
The people suffer. The people are targeted undefined those who do not follow the plan in play perish for noncompliance.
Schwab said he respected China’s undefinedtremendousundefined achievements at modernizing its economy over the last 40 years.
A country of zero freedom, low social mobility, social credit scores, and constant government surveillance?
Obviously, his comments have not aged well as protests have broken out all over China decrying the zero COVID policies that are imprisoning people in their own homes.
They are calling this the biggest uprising since Tiananmen square with people demanding the ousting of President Xi.
Demonstrations against Xi, his oppressive COVID crackdowns and increasingly authoritarian rule are now sweeping the country - with activists taking to the streets of Beijing, Shanghai, Wuhan and Nanjing in an unprecedented wave of dissent.
Schwab, whoundefineds a chameleon of sorts, knew that his China love would go down well with the Chinese state journalist-propagandists, but wouldnundefinedt sound too good to anyone else hearing the statement, so he qualified it with claims that every nation should get to choose its path of governance.
That rings hollow, given that the system heundefineds advocating for the West explicitly requires a party elite to do all the choosing for the people they rule over with an iron fist. As for China itself, well, did the Chinese get to choose the horrid system they lives under? Nope, in 1948, Mao Zedong, aided by, surprise, the COMINTERN, shot his way into power and imposed the brutal regime onto China by force, where it has been in power ever since.
Now we see China’s COVID revolution undefined as people are rebelling against being monitored and numbered undefined and in some cases culled from the populace.
State media rode to Xiundefineds defense today, with The Peopleundefineds Daily on Monday publishing an editorial backing key parts of his signature zero-COVID policy.
undefinedTimely detection and control of infected persons in the society, accurate identification and control of close contacts, and timely and accurate delineation and announcement of risk areas are the keys to seize the opportunity for epidemic prevention and control,undefined the paper wrote.
The scenes from China look as if they have been lifted form the Walking Dead or some contagion nightmare- with people with a yellow code on their health passports are being welded into their homes.
There is more to the story of course -as we dig deep into why Schwab sees China as a role model and why pathogen scares are going to be used to implement old Eugenics programs that include eliminating the burdensome and replacing them with genetic superiors.
Last week I reported that the globalist “pledge” at G20 and COP 27 was the commitment to vaccine passports, digital currency & much, much more.
We know that the digital platforms are set up at banks and there are many incentives being invented to get people to experiment with digital currencies. But there was one thing that stood out for me and that was the idea of the commitment to vaccine passports.
The “pandemic preparedness” spiel, calling for a “legally binding instrument” to “strengthen” global pandemic preparedness I felt was a too little too late thing undefined but they recommitted by stating:
“We reaffirm our commitment to strengthen global health governance, with the leading and coordination role of WHO and support from other international organizations. We support the work of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) that will draft and negotiate a legally binding instrument that should contain both legally binding and non-legally binding elements to strengthen pandemic preparedness.”
Then they went on to say that they will introduce international vaccine passports:
undefinedWe acknowledge the importance of shared technical standards and verification methods, under the framework of the IHR (2005), to facilitate seamless international travel, interoperability, and recognizing digital solutions and non-digital solutions, including proof of vaccinations. We support continued international dialogue and collaboration on the establishment of trusted global digital health networks.undefined
I know that the globalists want to call them vaccine passports – but I believe that what they are talking about is the same thing that former National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski talks about regarding a medical network identification card in the future that would determine your ability to participate in certain jobs, the military, or even going out to nightclubs.
Even before COVID-19 annihilated much of the world economy, the baby boomer demographic time bomb was discussed by think tanks and policy makers far and wide. During the past 25 years, young people increasingly put off having children with a 4.4% collapse in birthrates during the Dec. 2019-Dec 2020 year of COVID. Today western fertility levels have fallen to 1.7 children/woman which is far below the 2.1 levels needed to replace the population.
During this time, the baby boomer generation born between 1945-1960 increasingly found themselves beset with grey hair, and increased healthcare needs in their old age with the first wave having hit retirement years in 2010. While technological advances have extended average life expectancies from 61 years (in 1935) to 81 years today, the demographic imbalance of young: old means that society will essentially be incapable of supporting itself under current dynamics.
This was foretold by economists for years. I addressed the issue of zero population growth 10 years ago and the effect the aging baby boomer would have on the healthcare system. Back then I speculated that the extreme attitudes towards the burden of the aging population would lead to Eugenics directives that would be vital in sustaining a fracture economy.
I understood that there were many times in the history of the world when technocrat fascists would convince the population that humans were a menace or a cancer on this planet and that some people that are a burden on the economy will be seen as useless eaters.
But of course, there will be others that will be seen as superior genetically –whether they won the lottery in the gene pool or have been enhanced in the transhumanist future.
That was years ago–and I spoke of extremes because I know how inhumane governments can be, especially when they are advised by technocrats that look at populations as products rather than human beings.
Back then I stated all they need is a plan to convince the population to voluntarily thin the herd. This way those who are a burden to the economy would be eliminated and the Oligarchs would be able to control fewer individuals with threats of scarcity and disease.
I proposed that a comprehensive plan of action would be proposed globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations and various governments, to review ways the world can be a better place for sustainable development.
We discussed that the “sustainable development” of the globe consists of a number of suggestions to improve the impact on our environment.
First in the agenda is to establish a group consensus of crises and solutions that include separating the people and eventually culling or removing them.
This proposal would be no different than what was carried out against the Jews in Hitler’s day and they were marked for death because of their ethnicity, bloodline and other reasons that were actually made to fit into a corrupt eschatology.
Hitler had outlined the proposal of the final solution in his book, Mein Kampf. Hitler stated that it is important to “sift the human material” for those who support the decisions of the leaders and those who do not support these decisions. He also believed in culling those who were a burden on society.
The agenda of “sifting human material” is also found hidden in the policies of Global Warming Sustainability proposals. Henry Kissinger had a plan to starve the poor, The Georgia Guidestones were erected and later destroyed because of the message of maintaining the population at 500 million.
What if Henry Kissinger, the builders of the Georgia Guidestones, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, Elon Musk and even Jeffery Epstein had a plan? Letundefineds suppose that plan included plucking out undesirables and replacing them with manageable humans with superior genetic traits. They all believe that the planet would be better off with fewer people undefined but it is the type of people they wish to populate it with?
We have been talking about the culling of the planet -and with 8 billion going on 10 billion there has to be a moment where the lack of population will eventually do us in- but if they can control who dies undefined they can select a new human that they believe with be the fittest. made ti weed out those who have already rendered DNA inferior.
We know how it was done undefined or we can imagine.
They invent a virus that was just barely dangerous enough to ensure that it would be relatively easy to send the masses into a panic. Then have them begging for a medical solution to destroy the greatly feared boogieman who is hell-bent on killing half the population.
These same inventors of the “virus” cooked up a bogus cure in the form of a miracle vaccine and set out with a fear campaign to coerce every living soul to get a vaccine.
This vaccine would claim to wipe out the virus, but it also has a secret mission—the elimination of most human life on the planet.
It is not an immediate removal of life undefined it is the slow breaking down of the DNA of a human and some start dying off at early ages and without any explanation.
the virus was invented to create the fear base for the next step, which was the vaccine. The vaccine was designed to kill slowly, although at first there were some who had an acute response, but most did not. Over a decade or two (if not longer for some) people will succumb, birth rates will go down, and the population will be reduced.
But what happens after the population is reduced? The answer is that those who have died will be replaced with sustainable humans undefined that will be able to integrate with machines and technology.
Did you know that there are half a dozen quotes from high-ranking Nazi officials which enthusiastically confirm the use value of terror? It just so happens that we’ve discovered that biological terror trumps military terror as a tool of population control. But the biological terror does not end with pandemics and weapons that can kill millions.
Biological terror can also be used to thwart the evolutionary process.
This is done in many ways and you should become acquainted with the future biological terror that is being proposed that should make us think long and hard about how the major pharmaceutical companies have forced us into the shallow end of the gene pool to make way for the superior human undefined or the Ubermench
.As writer Wesley Smith of the National Review once said, the field of biotech and its misuse of health security, “opens the door to the soft tyranny of Gattaca and ultimately the dystopian nightmare of Brave New World.”
Of course, the thrust of that novel is the story of the happy conquest of society by eugenics. People are divided into class hierarchies. State breeding eliminates the monstrous family unit.
All classes are wonderfully indoctrinated and are eminently suggestible, having been so well conditioned by the state. They are also massively medicated. Most are blandly content with the banality of their lives, which are—above all—safe.
Gattaca is set in the future, when your genetic makeup determines your destiny-what job you will do, how much money you will make, and so on. Hawkeundefineds character dreams of becoming an astronaut but cannot, because he is not undefinedgenetically enhancedundefined and lacks crucial physical traits, including sufficient height and perfect vision. So he buys the DNA of a disabled athlete
Throughout the pandemic, one heard, almost as an unconscious refrain voiced by sleepwalkers, the phrase, “There’s so much we don’t know.” Implying that we must take all possible precautionary measures until we know more.
This was tantamount to a sanction for quarantines of the most draconian kind. On the heels of this rationalization of lockdowns and the capsizing of revered principles of legal standing, came the vaccine rollout. This, too, pivoted on the presumption of infectiousness. We were told that the vaccine was a cure all undefined but now the lie is that they never said that this was the case.
The effectiveness of the vaccine was called into question when several people who jot the jab eventually got Covid some have even had many bouts with it - even those who are boostered.
In a curious irony, it made quite literal the Latin meaning of habeas corpus: “You shall have the body.”
Your body was handed over to the pharmaceutical companies, where many had already surrendered their DNA to genetics analysts at 23 and me and other genetic collectors that sold your DNA information to the Chinese and to other pharmaceutical companies and genetics labs.
It is a troubling thought when you stop and ponder what your DNA is being used for and how it may have been used to create something that would alter it is such a way that your life would diminish or your body could be used indefinitely for genetic experiments like cloning and stem cell removal.
They shall have their bodies -and they were numbered and were provided with the data necessary to make a world that can be advanced or retracted to suit the needs of resource management.
In the eyes of millions, our bodies were forcibly handed over to pharmaceutical concerns, backed by governments, for the injection of novel therapies that would ostensibly fend off a seasonal respiratory virus with, again, an Infection Fatality Rate of less than one percent and principally threatening the elderly and ill.
But there could be other reasons why the transhumanist future scientists can cull and repopulate at will. They can weaken and strengthen the people at will as well undefined feeding them the food they invent labs and shooting them up with chemicals from jabs.
There is also the idea that with the DNA they have collected they can use it for future babies that would become genetically superior to us.
This month, the 8 billionth child entered the world. Demographers believe that the world’s population is moving towards 10 billion. But at some point, the curve will begin to move downwards. Families will shrink. People everywhere (except sub-Saharan Africa) will become older and older, leading to huge burdens on government social services.
The problem is that most countries have birth-rates below the replacement level. And no one knows how to coax women into having more children, as China has discovered, to its dismay. It moved from a one-child policy, to a two-child policy, to a three-child policy – and fertility has edged even lower.
According to the United Nations, more than a quarter of the worldundefineds countries now have pronatalist policies, including infertility-treatment benefits and undefinedbaby bonusundefined cash incentives. Meanwhile, a spate of new assisted reproductive technology startups are attracting big-name investors such as Peter Thiel and Steve Jurvetson, fueling a global fertility-services market that Research and Markets projects will reach $78.2 billion by 2025.
Even though there has been a lot of controversy over Elon Muskundefineds ownership of Twitter he has been very vocal about multiplying and replenishing the earth undefined but he has many ideas about how this can be done-but many of them are not conventional. He also might have given away the real reason he bought Twitter.
Elon Musk has been married twice but now describes himself as single. He has had at least nine children with a combination of wives, girlfriends, and surrogates. He also believed that there needs to be a way to create babies in labs that can be far superior to humans that are alive today.
There is a company called Genomic Prediction, where Muskundefineds OpenAI cofounder Sam Altman was an early investor. Altman, who is gay, also invests in a company called Conception. The startup plans to grow viable human eggs out of stem cells and could allow two biological males to reproduce.
Genomic Prediction is one of the first companies to offer PGT-P, a controversial new type of genetic testing that allows parents who are undergoing in vitro fertilization to select the undefinedbestundefined available embryos based on a variety of polygenic risk factors.
The last major figure to be associated with pronatalism was Jeffrey Epstein, who schemed to impregnate 20 women at a time on his New Mexico ranch.
Genetic screening, and the underlying assumption that some humans are born better than others, often invites comparisons to Nazi eugenic experiments. And then thereundefineds the fact that our primary cultural reference point for a pronatalist society is the brutal world of undefinedThe Handmaidundefineds Tale.undefined
The tech industryundefineds biggest players have been preoccupied with their legacies for years. In the 2010s, the longevity craze swept Silicon Valley, and industry titans like Jeff Bezos, 58, Sergey Brin, 49, and Larry Ellison, 78, poured billions of dollars into biotech companies they thought could help them defy death. Jeffrey Epstein reached out to scientists about freezing his head and penis to be revitalized hundreds of years later, while Peter Thiel, 55, was said to have sought blood transfusions from the young. (In response to the rumor, Thiel stated: undefinedOn the record, I am not a vampire.undefined)
Antiaging research has had some success in targeting specific diseases, but as the Ellisonundefineds and Bezosundefineds of the world get older, the chance of radical life extension in their life time becomes more unlikely. So some are turning to the next best thing: their progeny. For people who believe deeply in the genetic heritability of traits, passing on what they see as their superior DNA can be the ultimate path to influence.
While pronatalism is often associated with religious extremism, the version now trending in this community has more in common with dystopian sci-fi. There is so much DNA to use undefined so much catalogued and so much data that will collected from Twitter that you can imagine how numbered and processed this can get. There will be baby factories in the future just like what Huxley predicted in Brave New World. However, these ideas were being tossed around by scientists in the 1920undefineds
Scientifically, it’s called ectogenesis, a term coined by J.B.S. Haldane in 1924. A hugely influential science popularizer, Haldane did for his generation what Carl Sagan did later in the century. He got people thinking and talking about the implications of science and technology on our civilization, and did not shy away from inventing new words in order to do so. Describing ectogenesis as pregnancy occurring in an artificial environment, from fertilization to birth, Haldane predicted that by 2074 this would account for more than 70 percent of human births.
His prediction may yet be on target.
In discussing the idea in his work Daedalus–a reference to the inventor in Greek mythology who, through his inventions, strived to bring humans to the level of the gods–Haldane was diving into issues of his time, namely eugenics and the first widespread debates over contraception and population control.
Whether Haldane’s view will prove correct about the specific timing of when ectogenesis might become popular, or the numbers of children born that way, it’s certain that he was correct that at the same time, he was right that the societal implications are sure to be significant as the age of motherless birth approaches.
Progress has definitely been rapid over the last 20-30 years. In the mid-1990s, Japanese investigators succeeded in maintaining goat fetuses for weeks in a machine containing artificial amniotic fluid. At the same time, recent decades have seen a rapid advancement in neonatal intensive care that is pushing back the minimum gestational age from which human fetuses can be kept alive. Today, it is possible for a preterm fetus to survive when removed from the mother at a gestational age of slightly less than 22 weeks. That’s only a little more than halfway through the pregnancy (normally 40 weeks). And while rescuing an infant delivered at such an early point requires sophisticated, expensive equipment and care, the capability continues to increase.
Billionaires like Elon Musk want to save civilization by having tons of genetically superior kids. it is in this way the wealthy elite take undefinedcontrol of human evolution.undefined
According to tech-industry insiders, this type of rhetoric is spreading at intimate gatherings among some of the most powerful figures in America. The 23andMe cofounder Linda Aveyt told Business insider is that the discussions are numerous amongst the elite that wish to populate the earth with superior progeny.
So there can be an argument that the vaccines and many of the other drugs have been tailored for DNA manipulation creating many horrible side effects that are killing off people to make way for the genetically superior.
There is also this dangling idea of what Twitter can be used for now that it is headed by Musk and his ideas for a master race. It will certainly be a very good resource to data-mine citizens and identify people as possible candidates for genetic improvements.
Musk doesn’t care if sponsors are pulling he doesn’t need them because he has a catalog of names and businesses that he can use for future reference,
Back in the days of the Nazis, BM hired thousands of employees to execute a racial census to identify the Jews and once Hitler had that data, IBM created a punch card system to cross-reference the data against employment records and also financial institutions’ records to help Hitler ultimately pulverize the Jews.
Interestingly, the IBM of today is also involved in the creation of digital health passports, partnering with vaccine-maker Moderna in New York’s Excelsior Pass, which is being required for anyone attending sporting events or other large-venue events in New York.
Microsoft is likewise partnering with the city of Los Angeles schools and Anthem Health to implement the Daily Pass QR Health Portal that will track every student in that district under the premise of “protecting” people from COVID.
The health and genetics passport was talked about at the recent COP 27 and G20 conferences. The Universal ID will be implemented in some fashion in order to enforce medical and genetic security and to identify threats.
With fewer people on the planet, the remaining small number will be rather compliant due to the heavy brainwashing they have experienced. Survival of the fittest so to speak. These folks will be carrying around digital IDs, no money they have control over, and no bodily autonomy.
Slowly but surely babies will born unto this world as saviors and superiors.
undefined
